A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department

被引:13
作者
Barry, Kate [1 ]
Kumar, Saravana [2 ]
Linke, Rebecca [3 ]
Dawes, Emma [4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Adelaide Hosp, SA Med Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ S Australia, Int Ctr Allied Hlth Evidence iCAHE, City East Campus, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Womens & Childrens Hosp, SA Med Imaging, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Lead marker; medical imaging; patient safety; practice guidelines; radiography; side marker;
D O I
10.1002/jmrs.176
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe gold standard in general radiography is to place a radiopaque anatomical side marker in the field of view for each radiographic image prior to exposure. The advent of digital radiography has allowed for anatomical side markers to be digitally added to films as part of post-processing. The aim of this audit was to identify whether general X-ray images performed in a tertiary Women's and Children's Hospital were being appropriately annotated with a definitive side marker, and to identify factors that may contribute to inappropriately labelled images. MethodsFour hundred images from 201 patients' examinations occurring within a randomly selected time period were assessed to ascertain whether radiographic anatomical side markers were visible when images were viewed via the hospitals main viewing platform. The audit occurred in January 2014. The scope included both mobile and in-department general X-ray examinations, with the patient age range extending from 1 day to 18 years. ResultsOf the 400 images evaluated, 88 (22%) were found to have a lead marker that matched the anatomy being imaged within the primary beam; 289 (72.3%) images contained a correct digital marker inserted as part of the post-processing of the image. In total, 377 (94.2%) images were appropriately marked. Of the 23 (5.8%) images not marked correctly, 22 images had no marker and 1 was incorrectly marked with a digital marker. There was a noticeable relationship between absent anatomical markers and chest X-rays performed outside of the medical imaging department. ConclusionsWhile it is encouraging that the majority of the images assessed were correctly annotated, with only a small number of missing markers, there are opportunities for further improvement. The audit findings suggest that reduced access to lead markers influences marker use. Strategies that may improve compliance at an individual level include distribution of personalised anatomical side markers, and targeted staff education sessions. At a department level, regular audits and monitoring should be encouraged.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Aakre Kenneth T, 2006, J Am Coll Radiol, V3, P949, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.07.005
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, COD RPACT RAD PROT M
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CISC VIS NETW IND GL
[4]  
Australian Institute of Radiography, 2013, GUID PROF COND RAD R
[5]   INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I [J].
BRENNAN, TA ;
LEAPE, LL ;
LAIRD, NM ;
HEBERT, L ;
LOCALIO, AR ;
LAWTHERS, AG ;
NEWHOUSE, JP ;
WEILER, PC ;
HIATT, HH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) :370-376
[6]   The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them [J].
Croskerry, P .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2003, 78 (08) :775-780
[7]   Side markings of the neonatal chest X-ray: two legal cases of pneumothorax side mix up [J].
Finnbogason, T ;
Bremmer, S ;
Ringertz, H .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (04) :938-941
[8]  
Frank E., 2012, MERRILLS ATLAS RADIO
[9]   Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice [J].
Holden, JD .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (01) :65-70
[10]   Outpatient process quality evaluation and the Hawthorne effect [J].
Leonard, Kenneth ;
Masatu, Melkiory C. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (09) :2330-2340