Comparison of Single-stage Thermophilic and Mesophilic Anaerobic Sewage Sludge Digestion

被引:0
|
作者
Jang, Hyun Min [1 ]
Choi, Suk Soon [2 ]
Ha, Jeong Hyub [3 ]
机构
[1] Gwangju Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Gwangju 500712, South Korea
[2] Semyung Univ, Dept Biol & Environm Engn, Jecheon 27136, South Korea
[3] Pyeongtaek Univ, Dept Integrated Environm Syst, Pyeongtaek 17869, South Korea
来源
APPLIED CHEMISTRY FOR ENGINEERING | 2016年 / 27卷 / 05期
关键词
sewage sludge; thermophilic anaerobic digestion (TAD); mesophilic anaerobic digestion (MAD); methane production rate;
D O I
10.14478/ace.2016.1084
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this study, single-stage continuous anaerobic reactors to treat sewage sludge were operated under different temperature (55 and 35 degrees C; R-TAD and R-MAD) to evaluate the reactor stability and performance of the thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion. During the overall digestion, both anaerobic reactors maintained quite stable and constant pH and total alkalinity (TA) values in the range of 6.5-8.0 and 3-4 g CaCO3/L, respectively. After the start-up period, RTAD showed 10% higher VS removal efficiency than that of R-MAD (R-TAD; 43.3%; R-MAD : 33.6%). Although organic acids such as acetic and propionic acid were detected in both anaerobic reactors at the start-up period, all organic acids in RTAD and RMAD were consumed at the steady state condition. Also RTAD showed 31.4 % higher methane production rate (MPR) than that of RMAD at the steady state condition (RTAD; 243 mL CH4/L/d; R-MAD : 185 mL CH4/L/d). Meanwhile, the experimental results indicated similar methane yield between R-TAD and R-MAD.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 536
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge
    Song, YC
    Kwon, SJ
    Woo, JH
    WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (07) : 1653 - 1662
  • [2] Two-stage, thermophilic-mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge
    Roberts, R
    Davies, WJ
    Forster, CF
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1999, 77 (B2) : 93 - 97
  • [3] Two-stage, thermophilic-mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge
    Roberts, R.
    Davies, W.J.
    Forster, C.F.
    Process Safety and Environmental Protection: Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B, 1999, 77 (02): : 93 - 97
  • [4] Comparison of thermophilic and mesophilic single-stage, unmixed, batch anaerobic digestion of sugarbeet pulp
    Koppar, Abhay
    Pullammanappallil, Pratap
    ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, 2009, 134 (09): : 586 - 591
  • [5] STABILIZATION AND DISINFECTION OF SEWAGE-SLUDGE BY 2-STAGE ANAEROBIC THERMOPHILIC MESOPHILIC DIGESTION
    MITSDORFFER, R
    DEMHARTER, W
    BISCHOFSBERGER, W
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 22 (7-8) : 289 - 290
  • [6] Comparison of hyper-thermophilic-mesophilic two-stage with single-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: Process performance and microbial community analysis
    Wu, Li-Jie
    Higashimori, Atsushi
    Qin, Yu
    Hojo, Toshimasa
    Kubota, Kengo
    Li, Yu-You
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2016, 290 : 290 - 301
  • [7] Thermophilic and mesophilic temperature phase anaerobic co-digestion (TPAcD) compared with single-stage co-digestion of sewage sludge and sugar beet pulp lixiviation
    Montanes Alonso, Rocio
    Solera del Rio, Rosario
    Perez Garcia, Montserrat
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 93 : 107 - 115
  • [8] Bacterial community structure in treated sewage sludge with mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion
    Hana Stiborova
    Jan Wolfram
    Katerina Demnerova
    Tomas Macek
    Ondrej Uhlik
    Folia Microbiologica, 2015, 60 : 531 - 539
  • [9] Speciation of heavy metals in sewage sludge after mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion
    Dabrowska, Lidia
    CHEMICAL PAPERS, 2012, 66 (06): : 598 - 606
  • [10] Speciation of heavy metals in sewage sludge after mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion
    Lidia Dąbrowska
    Chemical Papers, 2012, 66 : 598 - 606