RAT MODEL TO INVESTIGATE ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ACTIVITIES OF SMALL-BOWEL TRANSPLANTS

被引:9
作者
PERNTHALER, H [1 ]
SALTUARI, L [1 ]
PFURTSCHELLER, G [1 ]
THALER, W [1 ]
WALDENBERGER, P [1 ]
KLIMA, G [1 ]
MARGREITER, R [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV INNSBRUCK,CHIRURG KLIN 1,TRANSPLANTAT CHIRURG ABT,ANICHSTR 35,A-6020 INNSBRUCK,AUSTRIA
来源
LANGENBECKS ARCHIV FUR CHIRURGIE | 1992年 / 377卷 / 06期
关键词
SMALL BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION; MOTILITY; RAT;
D O I
10.1007/BF00574773
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Adequate motility of a small bowel transplant is a prerequisite for its resorptive function as well as its self-purging capacity. The literature contains some reports on changes in motility following denervation or transplantation, but none on the impact of acute rejection on motility of small bowel grafts. Therefore an experimental model was established to meet the following criteria: orthotopic position of graft, adequate nutritional status even when graft is functionally impaired, chronically implantable electrodes attached to graft and corresponding segment of native bowel, isogeneic or allogeneic set-up. 10 cm of proximal jejunum were transplanted from Lewis donors to five Lewis recipients in an orthotopic position just distal of the ligament of Treitz without resection of native small bowel. Three bipolar electrodes were sutured to the graft and the same number to the subsequent recipient bowel. Serial myoelectric measurements were taken until the end of week 3. From day 5 on, migratory myoelectric complexes independent of myoelectric activities of native bowel were recorded. Pacemaker frequency of the graft was found to be the same as that of the transsected native small bowel. This early reappearance of myoelectric activities makes this model suitable for comparative studies of small bowel transplant motility and in particular its changes during rejection, since even in strongly allogeneic combinations Lewis small bowel does not show histological signs of rejection before day 6.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 351
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   SIGNIFICANCE OF VENOUS DRAINAGE FOR SMALL-BOWEL ALLOGRAFTS [J].
HASHIMOTO, N ;
ISHII, H ;
KITADA, T ;
UTSUNOMIYA, J .
HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 39 (06) :511-514
[22]   NUTRITIONAL CARE AND CANDIDATES FOR SMALL-BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION [J].
BEATH, SV ;
BOOTH, IW ;
MURPHY, MS ;
BUCKELS, JAC ;
MAYER, AD ;
MCKIERNAN, PJ ;
KELLY, DA .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1995, 73 (04) :348-350
[23]   GROWTH-HORMONE ENHANCES THE INTESTINAL ADAPTIVE RESPONSE AFTER SMALL-BOWEL RESECTION IN THE RAT [J].
GOMEZDESEGURA, IA ;
AGUILERA, MJ ;
CODESAL, J ;
DEMIGUEL, E .
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 1995, 87 (04) :288-293
[24]   DONOR CELL INFILTRATION OF RECIPIENT TISSUE AS AN INDICATOR OF SMALL-BOWEL ALLOGRAFT-REJECTION IN THE RAT [J].
LEAR, P ;
CLARK, CI ;
CRANE, P ;
POCKLEY, G ;
WOOD, R .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 6 (02) :85-88
[25]   INTRAVENOUS OR COLD EXVIVO ADMINISTRATION OF MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES FOR CONDITIONING OF RAT SMALL-BOWEL ALLOGRAFTS [J].
JOHNSSON, C ;
SCHEYNIUS, A ;
TUFVESON, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1991, 26 (09) :916-920
[26]   Anastomotic Healing in a Small Bowel Transplantation Model in the Rat [J].
Nir Wasserberg ;
Andreas G. Tzakis ;
Sergio F. Santiago ;
Phillip Ruiz ;
Shashikumar K. Salgar .
World Journal of Surgery, 2004, 28 :69-73
[27]   Living-donor pancreas and small-bowel transplantation [J].
Margreiter, R .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 384 (06) :544-549
[28]   IS REJECTION A DIFFUSE OR LOCALIZED PROCESS IN SMALL-BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION [J].
GURAKAR, A ;
FAGIUOLI, S ;
HASSANEIN, T ;
WRIGHT, HI ;
BALKAN, M ;
FREZZA, E ;
TODO, S ;
STARZL, TE ;
VANTHIEL, DH .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1994, 8 (07) :762-764
[29]   FUNCTIONAL-ASPECTS OF SMALL-BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION IN RATS [J].
DEBRUIN, RWF ;
HEINEMAN, E ;
JEEKEL, J ;
MEIJSSEN, MAC ;
LINDEMANS, J ;
BONTHUIS, F ;
MARQUET, RL .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 27 (06) :483-488
[30]   Living-donor pancreas and small-bowel transplantation [J].
R. Margreiter .
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 1999, 384 :544-549