Discourse analysis: bridging frameworks or cultivating practices?

被引：2

作者：

Tracy, Karen ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Commun, Boulder, CO 80309 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF MULTICULTURAL DISCOURSES | 2016年 / 11卷 / 04期

关键词：

Discourse analysis; rhetorical perspective; communication; practice;

D O I：

10.1080/17447143.2016.1226317

中图分类号：

C95 [民族学、文化人类学];

学科分类号：

0304 ; 030401 ;

摘要：

This essay responds to Gee's article in which he proposes that discourse analysis is an approach that can bridge frames. I begin by elaborating a difference in academic cultures among scholars who identify as discourse analysts. I argue that a cultural grounding is built into discourse analysis and study of communication more generally. The essay concludes by offering the idea of cultivating practices as an alternative to the idea of bridging frameworks.

引用

页码：360 / 366

页数：7

共 20 条

[1] Allen DS., 2004, TALKING STRANGERS AN
[2] Clark H. H., 1996, USING LANGUAGE, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
[3] Pragmatism in the field of communication theory
Craig, Robert T.
[J]. COMMUNICATION THEORY, 2007, 17 (02) : 125 - 145
[4] Building Grounded Practical Theory in Applied Communication Research: Introduction to the Special Issue
Craig, Robert T.
Tracy, Karen
[J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2014, 42 (03) : 229 - 243
[5] GROUNDED PRACTICAL THEORY - THE CASE OF INTELLECTUAL DISCUSSION
CRAIG, RT
TRACY, K
[J]. COMMUNICATION THEORY, 1995, 5 (03) : 248 - 272
[6] Communication theory as a Field
Craig, RT
[J]. COMMUNICATION THEORY, 1999, 9 (02) : 119 - 161
[7] Dewey J., 1927, PUBLIC SES PROBLEMES
[8] THINK PRACTICALLY AND LOOK LOCALLY - LANGUAGE AND GENDER AS COMMUNITY-BASED PRACTICE
ECKERT, P
MCCONNELLGINET, S
[J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 1992, 21 : 461 - 490
[9] Garcia A. C., 2011, CONVERSATION GENDER, P272
[10] Gee J. P, 2012, ROUTLEDGE HDB DISCOU

← 1 2 →