PROJECTION OF THENAR MUSCLE AFFERENTS TO FRONTAL AND PARIETAL CORTEX OF HUMAN-SUBJECTS

被引:42
作者
GANDEVIA, SC
BURKE, D
机构
[1] PRINCE HENRY HOSP,INST NEUROL SCI,DEPT CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL,SYDNEY,NSW,AUSTRALIA
[2] PRINCE WALES HOSP,INST NEUROL SCI,DEPT CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL,SYDNEY,NSW,AUSTRALIA
[3] UNIV NEW S WALES,SYDNEY,NSW,AUSTRALIA
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1990年 / 77卷 / 05期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cutaneous afferents; Muscle afferents; Somatosensory evoked potentials;
D O I
10.1016/0168-5597(90)90057-K
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
There is some controversy about the projection of muscle afferents from the human upper limb to cerebral cortex and about their contribution to somatosensory evoked potentials. In 8 normal volunteers, the somatosensory projections of muscle and cutaneous afferents from the hand were recorded at 21 scalp sites, using a non-cephalic reference. Low-threshold thenar muscle afferents were selectively activated by intramuscular microstimulation. In addition, the averaged data for the projections were mapped for each individual. In each subject a focal parietal negativity was detected over the contralateral parietal cortex at a mean latency of 20.8 msec (S.D. 1.15 msec) following stimulation of thenar muscle afferents. The amplitude of the parietal 'N20-P25' was relatively small (mean 0.49 μV, range 0.18-1.56 μV). A small focal positivity was detected, maximal over contralateral frontal cortex at 22.8 msec (S.D. 2.05 msec) but recorded bilaterally. In all subjects subcortical positive waves (P9 and P14) were defined for the muscle afferent volley. This pattern of cortical activity was similar to that for the projection from the digital nerves of the index finger. For the cutaneous input the latency of the parietal 'N20' was 21.7 msec (S.D. 1.17 msec) and of the frontal 'P22' was 24.2 msec (S.D. 3.09 msec). The amplitude of the parietal 'N20-P25' was larger for the cutaneous projection (mean 1.59 μV; range 0.65-4.28 μV). © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 361
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ABBRUZZESE G, 1985, EXP BRAIN RES, V58, P544
[2]   INTERFERING CUTANEOUS STIMULATION AND THE MUSCLE AFFERENT CONTRIBUTION TO CORTICAL POTENTIALS [J].
BURKE, D ;
GANDEVIA, SC .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 70 (02) :118-125
[3]   INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CUTANEOUS AND MUSCLE AFFERENT-PROJECTIONS TO CEREBRAL-CORTEX IN MAN [J].
BURKE, D ;
GANDEVIA, SC ;
MCKEON, B ;
SKUSE, NF .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 53 (04) :349-360
[4]   RESPONSES TO PASSIVE MOVEMENT OF RECEPTORS IN JOINT, SKIN AND MUSCLE OF THE HUMAN HAND [J].
BURKE, D ;
GANDEVIA, SC ;
MACEFIELD, G .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1988, 402 :347-361
[5]   THE AFFERENT VOLLEYS RESPONSIBLE FOR SPINAL PROPRIOCEPTIVE REFLEXES IN MAN [J].
BURKE, D ;
GANDEVIA, SC ;
MCKEON, B .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1983, 339 (JUN) :535-552
[6]   ATRIOPEPTIN II - DIFFERENTIAL SENSITIVITY OF ARTERIES AND VEINS FROM THE RAT [J].
COHEN, ML ;
SCHENCK, KW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 108 (01) :103-104
[7]  
CRAMMOND DJ, 1985, NEUROPHYSIOL, V61, P396
[8]  
DESMEDT JE, 1987, J PHYSIOLOGY PARIS, V82, P64
[9]   NON-CEPHALIC REFERENCE RECORDING OF EARLY SOMATOSENSORY POTENTIALS TO FINGER STIMULATION IN ADULT OR AGING NORMAL MAN - DIFFERENTIATION OF WIDESPREAD N18 AND CONTRALATERAL N20 FROM THE PREROLANDIC P22 AND N30 COMPONENTS [J].
DESMEDT, JE ;
CHERON, G .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 52 (06) :553-570
[10]   COLOR IMAGING OF PARIETAL AND FRONTAL SOMATOSENSORY POTENTIAL FIELDS EVOKED BY STIMULATION OF MEDIAN OR POSTERIOR TIBIAL NERVE IN MAN [J].
DESMEDT, JE ;
BOURGUET, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (01) :1-17