Computer-Aided Surgery Does Not Increase the Accuracy of Dorsal Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Analysis of 2,003 Pedicle Screws in a Level I Trauma Center

被引:24
|
作者
Kraus, Michael [1 ]
Weiskopf, Julia [2 ]
Dreyhaupt, Jens [3 ]
Krischak, Gert [4 ]
Gebhard, Florian [5 ]
机构
[1] Donau Ries Hosp Donauworth, Ctr Orthopaed Trauma & Spine Surg, D-86609 Donauworth, Germany
[2] Univ Heart Ctr Freiburg, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Ulm, Inst Epidemiol & Med Biometry, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
[4] Univ Ulm, Inst Res Rehabil Med, Bad Buchau, Germany
[5] Univ Ulm, Dept Trauma Hand & Reconstruct Surg, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
关键词
computer assisted pedicle screw placement; computer navigation; spine; pedicle screw; image based guidance;
D O I
10.1055/s-0034-1396430
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design A retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Objective Meta-analyses suggest that computer-assisted systems can increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement for dorsal spinal fusion procedures. The results of further meta-analyses report that in the thoracic spine, both the methods have comparable placement accuracy. These studies are limited due to an abundance of screw classification systems. The aim of this study was to assess the placement accuracy and potentially influencing factors of three-dimensionally navigated versus conventionally inserted pedicle screws. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database at a level I trauma center of pedicle screw placement (computer-navigated versus traditionally placed) for dorsal spinal stabilizations. The cases spanned a 5.5-year study period (January 1, 2005, to June 30, 2010). The perforations of the pedicle were differentiated in three grades based on the postoperative computed tomography. Results The overall placement accuracy was 86% in the conventional group versus 79% in the computer-navigated group (grade 0). The computer-navigated procedures were superior in the lumbar spine and the conventional procedures were superior in the thoracic spine, but both failed to be of statistical significance. The level of experience of the performing surgeon and the patient's body mass index did not influence the placement accuracy. The only significant influence was the spinal segment: the higher the spinal level where the fusion was performed, the more likely the screw was displaced. Conclusions The computer-navigated and conventional methods are both safe procedures to place transpedicular screws at the traumatized thoracic and lumbar spine. At the moment, three-dimensionally based navigation does not significantly increase the placement accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 101
页数:9
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine fractures - Part II: A retrospective analysis of 278 pedicle screws using computed tomographic scans
    Zdichavsky M.
    Blauth M.
    Knop C.
    Lotz J.
    Krettek C.
    Bastian L.
    European Journal of Trauma, 2004, 30 (4): : 241 - 247
  • [2] Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbosacral Spine Using a Conventional Intraoperative Fluoroscopy-Guided Technique: A National Neurosurgical Education and Training Center Analysis of 1236 Consecutive Screws
    Nevzati, Edin
    Marbacher, Serge
    Soleman, Jehuda
    Perrig, Wolfgang Nicolas
    Diepers, Michael
    Khamis, Abdussalam
    Fandino, Javier
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (05) : 866 - U540
  • [3] Accuracy and Safety in Screw Placement in the High Cervical Spine Retrospective Analysis of O-arm-based Navigation-assisted C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screws
    Hur, Jung-Woo
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
    Shin, Myeong-Hoon
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (04): : E193 - E199