COMPARISON OF PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA IN CHILDREN BY IV AND SC ROUTES OF ADMINISTRATION

被引:37
作者
DOYLE, E [1 ]
MORTON, NS [1 ]
MCNICOL, LR [1 ]
机构
[1] ROYAL HOSP SICK CHILDREN,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,GLASGOW G3 8SJ,SCOTLAND
关键词
ANALGESIA; PEDIATRIC; PATIENT-CONTROLLED;
D O I
10.1093/bja/72.5.533
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Sixty children undergoing appendicectomy were allocated randomly to receive one of two PCA regimens with morphine. Group IV received standard iv. PCA with a bolus dose of morphine 20 mu g kg(-1) and a background infusion of 4 mu g kg(-1) h(-1) while group SC received PCA by the s.c. route with a bolus dose of morphine 20 mu g kg(-1) and a background infusion of 5 mu g kg(-1) h(-1). in both groups there was a lockout interval of 5 min. Group SC self-administered significantly less morphine (P < 0.05) and had a significantly (P < 0.09) greater percentage of valid demands for analgesia than group IV. There were no differences in pain scores between the groups at rest or during movement. Group IV suffered significantly (P < 0.01) more hypoxic episodes than group SC. There were no differences between groups in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting or oversedation. S.c. PCA appears to be as effective and safe as iv. PCA. By giving patients feedback on the occurrence of valid demands for analgesia, s.c. PCA may produce more appropriate and effective use of PCA.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 536
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] BROADMAN LM, 1989, CANADIAN J ANAESTHES, V36, pS96
  • [2] BROWN RE, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, pS22
  • [3] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT BOLUS DOSES OF MORPHINE FOR PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA IN CHILDREN
    DOYLE, E
    MOTTART, KJ
    MARSHALL, C
    MORTON, NS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (02) : 160 - 163
  • [4] PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA WITH LOW-DOSE BACKGROUND INFUSIONS AFTER LOWER ABDOMINAL-SURGERY IN CHILDREN
    DOYLE, E
    HARPER, I
    MORTON, NS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 71 (06) : 818 - 822
  • [5] GAUKROGER PB, 1989, ANAESTHESIA INTENSIV, V17, P10
  • [6] Gillespie JA, 1992, PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHES, V2, P51, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-9592.1992.tb00480.x
  • [7] CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS INFUSION OF MORPHINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF
    GOUDIE, TA
    ALLAN, MWB
    LONSDALE, M
    BURROW, LM
    MACRAE, WA
    GRANT, IS
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 40 (11) : 1086 - 1092
  • [8] CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS INFUSION OF MORPHINE - AN ALTERNATIVE TO EXTRADURAL MORPHINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF
    HINDSHOLM, KB
    BREDAHL, C
    JENSEN, MK
    KIDMOSE, L
    HERLEVSEN, P
    NIELSEN, FB
    OLESEN, AS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 71 (04) : 580 - 582
  • [9] THE BENEFITS AND PITFALLS OF PULSE OXIMETRY
    HUTTON, P
    CLUTTONBROCK, T
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6902) : 457 - 458
  • [10] PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA - ASSESSMENT OF MACHINE FEEDBACK TO PATIENTS
    JOHNSON, TW
    LUSCOMBE, FE
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 47 (10) : 899 - 901