Providing feedback to learners in outpatient and ambulatory care practice settings

被引:2
作者
Hall, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Miguel, Alexander [1 ]
Weitzel, Kristin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, MTM Commun & Care Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmacotherapy & Translat Res, POB 100486, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Hlth Personalized Med Program, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
Feedback; Ambulatory; Experiential; Student; Preceptor; Learner; Resident;
D O I
10.1016/j.cptl.2014.12.007
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Feedback is consistently recognized as essential for growth and development of both students and residents in experiential teaching. Providing adequate feedback remains a persistent challenge for preceptors in both outpatient and ambulatory care practice environments. These practice settings are characterized by a variety of factors that may negatively affect preceptors' abilities to provide meaningful feedback, including immediate patient care needs and unpredictable patient cases in an often fast-paced practice environment. Additionally, learners in these environments have high visibility within these practices due to an emphasis on direct patient care and interprofessional provider interactions. Purpose: In this article, we define feedback and its importance, identify challenges unique to the outpatient and ambulatory care practice settings, and describe clinical teaching models that support effective, timely delivery of feedback in these settings, including modeling, coaching, questioning, and the five-step microskills model for clinical teaching and feedback. Conclusion: To effectively address unique needs in these settings, preceptors can draw from existing clinical teaching models and communication strategies described in the literature. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 356
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The impact of feedback to medical housestaff on chart documentation and quality of care in the outpatient setting [J].
Opila, DA .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 12 (06) :352-356
[22]   Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice? [J].
Toppino, Thomas C. ;
Heslin, Kelsey A. ;
Curley, Taylor M. ;
Jackiewicz, Michael K. ;
Flowers, Colin S. ;
Phelan, Heather-Anne .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2021, 49 (07) :1423-1435
[23]   Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice? [J].
Thomas C. Toppino ;
Kelsey A. Heslin ;
Taylor M. Curley ;
Michael K. Jackiewicz ;
Colin S. Flowers ;
Heather-Anne Phelan .
Memory & Cognition, 2021, 49 :1423-1435
[24]   Providing corrective feedback during retrieval practice does not increase retrieval-induced forgetting [J].
Erdman, Matthew R. ;
Chan, Jason C. K. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 25 (06) :692-703
[25]   Examining EFL learners' quantity and quality of uptake of teacher corrective feedback on writing across three different editing settings [J].
Alharthi, Saleh Mosleh .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2025, 63
[26]   Closing the Feedback Loop: An Interactive Voice Response System to Provide Follow-up and Feedback in Primary Care Settings [J].
Willig, James H. ;
Krawitz, Marc ;
Panjamapirom, Anantachai ;
Ray, Midge N. ;
Nevin, Christa R. ;
English, ThomasM. ;
Cohen, Mark P. ;
Berner, Eta S. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2013, 37 (02)
[27]   Closing the Feedback Loop: An Interactive Voice Response System to Provide Follow-up and Feedback in Primary Care Settings [J].
James H. Willig ;
Marc Krawitz ;
Anantachai Panjamapirom ;
Midge N. Ray ;
Christa R. Nevin ;
Thomas M. English ;
Mark P. Cohen ;
Eta S. Berner .
Journal of Medical Systems, 2013, 37
[28]   Educators' behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis [J].
Johnson, Christina E. ;
Keating, Jennifer L. ;
Farlie, Melanie K. ;
Kent, Fiona ;
Leech, Michelle ;
Molloy, Elizabeth K. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)
[29]   Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis [J].
Christina E. Johnson ;
Jennifer L. Keating ;
Melanie K. Farlie ;
Fiona Kent ;
Michelle Leech ;
Elizabeth K. Molloy .
BMC Medical Education, 19
[30]   Feedback in radiology: Essential tool for improving user experience and providing value-based care [J].
Rockall, Andrea ;
Visser, Jacob J. ;
Garcia-Villar, Cristina ;
Lev-Cohain, Naama ;
Omoumi, Patrick ;
Revel, Marie-Pierre ;
Strudwick, Ruth Mary .
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2025, 16 (01)