New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature

被引:37
作者
Gaillard, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Tranchart, Hadrien [1 ,2 ]
Lainas, Panagiotis [1 ,2 ]
Dagher, Ibrahim [2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Antoine Beclere, Dept Digest Minimally Invas Surg, 157 Rue Porte Trivaux, F-92140 Clamart, France
[2] Univ Paris 11, Fac Med, F-91405 Orsay, France
关键词
Cholecystectomy; Laparoscopy; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery; Minilaparoscopy; Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; Review;
D O I
10.4240/wjgs.v7.i10.243
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed abdominal intervention in Western countries. In an attempt to reduce the invasiveness of the procedure, surgeons have developed single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). The aim of this review was to determine the role of these new minimally invasive approaches for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of gallstone related disease. Current literature remains insufficient for the correct assessment of emerging techniques for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. None of these procedures has demonstrated clear benefits over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SILC cannot be currently recommended as it can be associated with an increased risk of bile duct injury and incisional hernia incidence. NOTES cholecystectomy is still experimental, although hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy is gaining popularity in clinical practice. As it is standardized and almost identical to the standard laparoscopic technique, MLC could lead to limited benefits without exposing patients to increased postoperative complications, being therefore adoptable for routine elective cholecystectomy. Technical challenges of SILC and NOTES cholecystectomy could be addressed with the evolution of new surgical tools that need to catch up with the innovative minds of surgeons. Regardless the place of these approaches in the future, robotization may be necessary to impose them as standard treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 248
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]   One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Navarra, G ;
Pozza, E ;
Occhionorelli, S ;
Carcoforo, P ;
Donini, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (05) :695-695
[32]   Needlescopic or minisite cholecystectomy [J].
Ngoi, SS ;
Goh, P ;
Kok, K ;
Kum, CK ;
Cheah, WK .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (03) :303-305
[33]   Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250) [J].
Noguera, Jose F. ;
Cuadrado, Angel ;
Dolz, Carlos ;
Olea, Jose M. ;
Garcia, Juan C. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (12) :3435-3441
[34]   Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery:: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos) [J].
Park, PO ;
Bergström, M ;
Ikeda, K ;
Fritscher-Ravens, A ;
Swain, P .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (04) :601-606
[35]   Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Studies Comparing Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CMLC) [J].
Pisanu, Adolfo ;
Reccia, Isabella ;
Porceddu, Giulia ;
Uccheddu, Alessandro .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (09) :1790-1801
[36]   Single-Port Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Nonrandomized Studies [J].
Qiu, Jianguo ;
Yuan, Haichao ;
Chen, Shuting ;
He, Zhiliang ;
Han, Ping ;
Wu, Hong .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (10) :815-831
[37]   Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with miniaturized instrumentation in 50 consecutive cases [J].
Reardon, PR ;
Kamelgard, JI ;
Applebaum, B ;
Rossman, L ;
Brunicardi, FC .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 23 (02) :128-132
[38]   Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Saad, S. ;
Strassel, V. ;
Sauerland, S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (03) :339-349
[39]   Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Sajid, Muhammad S. ;
Ladwa, Nikhil ;
Kalra, Lorain ;
Hutson, Kristian K. ;
Singh, Krishna K. ;
Sayegh, Mazin .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (11) :2644-2653
[40]   Needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis [J].
Sajid, Muhammad S. ;
Khan, Munir A. ;
Ray, Kausik ;
Cheek, Elizabeth ;
Baig, Mirza K. .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 79 (06) :437-442