Benefit Corporations: Towards a Renewed Shareholder Primacy?

被引：0

作者：

Roncancio Rachid, Rolando ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Lagos Cortes, Diogenes ^{[4
,5
,6
]}

Cortes Mejia, Sebastian ^{[7
,8
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Navarra, Inst Empresa & Humanismo, Gobierno & Cultura Org, Pamplona, Spain

[2] Univ La Sabana, Inalde Business Sch, Direcc Empresas, Chia, Colombia

[3] Univ La Sabana, Inalde Business Sch, Dept Direcc Gen, Chia, Colombia

[4] Univ Nacl La Plata, Ciencias Adm, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

[5] Univ Ind Santander, Ingn Ind, Bucaramanga, Colombia

[6] Univ La Sabana, Inalde Business Sch, Chia, Colombia

[7] Iowa State Univ, Management, Ames, IA USA

[8] Univ La Sabana, Chia, Colombia

来源：

REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD EMPRESA | 2018年 / 20卷 / 35期

关键词：

Benefit corporation; shareholder primacy; corporate governance; stakeholder's management;

D O I：

10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.5834

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

The purpose of this study is to ponder how the benefit corporations (bc) lead to a new organizational primacy by perusing wellness for all the stakeholders. Therefore, bc are compared with the norm of the shareholder primacy, from three perspectives: property and control, prioritized interests, and fiduciary duties. It is concluded that in the bc: a) property and control remain in shareholders who hold the power to create or finish bc's commitments, and the mechanisms to guarantee the fulfillment of the purpose of the organization; b) maximization of the value in bc is different because it pursuits the wellbeing of all the stakeholders, nevertheless, it is pointed out that this goal is difficult to reach; c) although fiduciary duties are enlarged to consider possible effects of bc on all stakeholders, this does not imply an obligation of the organization with any of these groups, in practice, only the discretion of managers who keep their loyalty and care towards shareholders is enlarged.

引用

页码：143 / 168

页数：26

共 48 条

[11] Blount J., 2013, ST MARYS LAW J, V44, P617, DOI [10.2139/SSRN.2133703, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2133703]
[12] Boatright JR, 2006, J PRIV ENTERP, V22, P106
[13] Corporate charitable giving
Brudney, V
Ferrell, A
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2002, 69 (03) : 1191 - 1218
[14] Butler HN, 1999, CORNELL LAW REV, V84, P1195
[15] The illusion of law: The legitimating schemas of modern policy and corporate law
Chen, R
Hanson, J
[J]. MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 2004, 103 (01) : 1 - 149
[16] Clark W. H., 2011, W MITCHELL LAW REV, V38, P817
[17] Clark William H., 2013, NEED RATIONALE BENEF
[18] DE CIFUENTES Marcela CASTRO, 1986, REV DERECHO PRIVADO, V1, P123
[19] FOR WHOM ARE CORPORATE MANAGERS TRUSTEES?
Dodd, E. Merrick, Jr.
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1932, 45 (07) : 1145 - 1163
[20] VOTING IN CORPORATE-LAW
EASTERBROOK, FH
FISCHEL, DR
[J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1983, 26 (02) : 395 - 427

← 1 2 3 4 5 →