HEMODYNAMIC AND CATECHOLAMINE CHANGES AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH EITHER THIOPENTONE OR PROPOFOL WITH SUXAMETHONIUM

被引:26
|
作者
BROSSY, MJ [1 ]
JAMES, MFM [1 ]
JANICKI, PK [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CAPE TOWN,MED SCH OBSERV,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,CAPE TOWN 7925,SOUTH AFRICA
关键词
ANESTHETICS; IV; PROPOFOL; THIOPENTONE; INTUBATION TRACHEAL; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1093/bja/72.5.596
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We have compared the haemodynamic and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in 43 patients after induction of anaesthesia with either thiopentone 5.1 (SD 0.9) mg kg(-1) or propofol 2.2(0.1) mg kg(-1), each with suxamethonium and without opioid pretreatment. Heart rate increased significantly above baseline after induction and intubation in both groups, but there were no differences between groups. Arterial pressure increased significantly at 1 min after intubation in both groups and at 2 min in the thiopentone group only. Plasma concentrations of adrenaline increased significantly compared with concentrations before induction, 1 min after intubation in both groups and at 2 min in the thiopentone group only. Plasma concentrations of adrenaline were significantly greater in the thiopentone group than in the propofol group at both 1 and 2 min after intubation. Plasma concentrations of noradrenaline showed no significant time-based within-group changes, but were significantly greater in the thiopentone group at 1 and 2 min after intubation. We conclude that doses of either thiopentone or propofol sufficient to obtund the eyelash reflex with suxamethonium 1 mg kg(-1) alone do not adequately block the catecholamine and hypertensive responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in normal patients and although propofol suppressed increases in catecholamines to a greater extent than thiopentone, there were no clinical advantages.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 598
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MYALGIA AND BIOCHEMICAL-CHANGES FOLLOWING SUXAMETHONIUM AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH THIOPENTONE OR PROPOFOL
    MADDINENI, VR
    MIRAKHUR, RK
    COOPER, AR
    ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (07) : 626 - 628
  • [2] HEMODYNAMIC AND CATECHOLAMINE RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION - COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE
    LINDGREN, L
    YLIHANKALA, A
    RANDELL, T
    KIRVELA, M
    SCHEININ, M
    NEUVONEN, PJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 70 (03) : 306 - 310
  • [3] INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL (DIPRIVAN) OR THIOPENTONE AND INTERACTIONS WITH SUXAMETHONIUM, ATRACURIUM AND VECURONIUM
    NIGHTINGALE, P
    PETTS, NV
    HEALY, TEJ
    KAY, B
    MCGUINNESS, K
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1985, 61 : 31 - 34
  • [4] COMPARISON OF THE HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH EITHER PROPOFOL OR THIOPENTONE IN ASA-III PATIENTS
    BONE, ME
    MOBLEY, K
    FELL, D
    SMITH, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 59 (10) : P1318 - P1319
  • [5] HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF THIOPENTONE, MIDAZOLAM, ETOMIDATE AND PROPOFOL DURING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA
    CASTOR, G
    NIEDERMARK, I
    HELMS, J
    MOTSCH, J
    DRUG INVESTIGATION, 1991, 3 (03): : 188 - 194
  • [6] PROPOFOL OR THIOPENTONE - EFFECTS ON INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE ASSOCIATED WITH INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION (FACILITATED WITH SUXAMETHONIUM)
    MIRAKHUR, RK
    SHEPHERD, WFI
    DARRAH, WC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 59 (04) : 431 - 436
  • [7] A COMPARISON OF THIOPENTONE AND PROPOFOL (DIPRIVAN) FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA
    UTTING, JE
    FAHY, L
    VANMOURIK, GA
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1985, 61 : 84 - 84
  • [8] PROPOFOL VERSUS THIOPENTONE FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN AFTER PREMEDICATION WITH MIDAZOLAM
    PIOTROWSKI, R
    PETROW, N
    ANAESTHESIST, 1990, 39 (08): : 398 - 405
  • [9] HEMODYNAMIC AND PLASMA-CATECHOLAMINE RESPONSES DURING TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA FOR LARYNGOMICROSCOPY - THIOPENTONE COMPARED WITH PROPOFOL
    MUSTOLA, ST
    BAER, GA
    METSAKETELA, T
    LAIPPALA, P
    ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 50 (02) : 108 - 113
  • [10] Hemodynamic Changes following Anesthesia Induction and LMA Insertion with Propofol, Etomidate, and Propofol
    Hosseinzadeh, Hamzeh
    Golzari, Samad E. J.
    Torabi, Effat
    Dehdilani, Marjan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC RESEARCH, 2013, 5 (03) : 109 - 112