Agent-based models in sociology

被引:71
作者
Bianchi, Federico [1 ]
Squazzoni, Flaminio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, Dept Econ & Management, Brescia, Italy
关键词
agent-based models; sociology; social norms; social influence; collective behavior; social networks;
D O I
10.1002/wics.1356
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
This article looks at 20 years of applications of agent-based models (ABMs) in sociology and, in particular, their explanatory achievements and methodological insights. These applications have helped sociologists to examine agent interaction in social outcomes and have helped shift analyses away from structural and aggregate factors, to the role of agency. They have improved the realism of the micro-behavioral foundations of sociological models, by complementing analytic modeling and game theory-inspired analyses. Secondly, they have helped us to dissect the role of social structures in constraining individual behavior more precisely than in variable-based sociology. Finally, simulation outcomes have given us a more dynamic view of the interplay between individual behavior and social structures, thus promoting a more evolutionary and process-based approach to social facts. Attention here has been paid to social norms, social influence, and culture dynamics, across different disciplines such as behavioral sciences, complexity science, sociology, and economics. We argue that these applications can help sociology to achieve more rigorous research standards, by promoting a modeling environment and providing tighter cross-disciplinary integration. Recently, certain methodological improvements toward model standardization, replication, and validation have been achieved. As a result, the impact of these models in sociology is expected to grow even more in the future. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 306
页数:23
相关论文
共 132 条
[21]   Neighborhood choice and neighborhood change [J].
Bruch, Elizabeth E. ;
Mare, Robert D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2006, 112 (03) :667-709
[22]   How Population Structure Shapes Neighborhood Segregation [J].
Bruch, Elizabeth E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2014, 119 (05) :1221-1278
[23]  
Buskens V., 2002, GROUP COHESION TRUST, V19, P167, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(02)19007-2, DOI 10.1016/S0882-6145(02)19007-2]
[24]   Consent or conflict: Coevolution of coordination and networks [J].
Buskens, Vincent ;
Corten, Rense ;
Weesie, Jeroen .
JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 2008, 45 (02) :205-222
[25]   Strong reciprocity and team production: Theory and evidence [J].
Carpenter, Jeffrey ;
Bowles, Samuel ;
Gintis, Herbert ;
Hwang, Sung-Ha .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2009, 71 (02) :221-232
[26]   Homophily, cultural drift and the co-evolution of cultural groups [J].
Centola, Damon ;
Gonzalez-Avella, Juan Carlos ;
Eguiluz, Victor M. ;
San Miguel, Maxi .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2007, 51 (06) :905-929
[27]   Cooperation Could Evolve in Complex Networks when Activated Conditionally on Network Characteristics [J].
Chiang, Yen-Sheng .
JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2013, 16 (02)
[28]   Structure and strategy in collective action [J].
Chwe, MSY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1999, 105 (01) :128-156
[29]   Understanding the social context of the Schelling segregation model [J].
Clark, William A. V. ;
Fossett, Mark .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (11) :4109-4114
[30]   The role of social structure in the maintenance of cooperative regimes [J].
Cohen, MD ;
Riolo, RL ;
Axelrod, R .
RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 2001, 13 (01) :5-32