Rectourethral Fistula: Systemic Review of and Experiences With Various Surgical Treatment Methods
被引:47
作者:
Choi, Ji Hye
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South KoreaSeoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Choi, Ji Hye
[1
]
Jeon, Byeong Geon
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Bundang Jesaeng Hosp, Dept Surg, Seongnam, South KoreaSeoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Jeon, Byeong Geon
[2
]
Choi, Sang-Gi
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South KoreaSeoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Choi, Sang-Gi
[1
]
Han, Eon Chul
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South KoreaSeoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Han, Eon Chul
[1
]
Ha, Heon-Kyun
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
MyongJi Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South KoreaSeoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Ha, Heon-Kyun
[1
,3
]
Oh, Heung-Kwon
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Bundang Hosp, Seongnam, South KoreaSeoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Oh, Heung-Kwon
[1
,4
]
Choe, Eun Kyung
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Healthcare Res Inst, Healthcare Syst, Gangnam Ctr, Seoul, South KoreaSeoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Choe, Eun Kyung
[1
,5
]
Moon, Sang Hui
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South KoreaSeoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Moon, Sang Hui
[1
]
Ryoo, Seung-Bum
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South KoreaSeoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Ryoo, Seung-Bum
[1
]
Park, Kyu Joo
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South KoreaSeoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
Park, Kyu Joo
[1
]
机构:
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Bundang Jesaeng Hosp, Dept Surg, Seongnam, South Korea
[3] MyongJi Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Bundang Hosp, Seongnam, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Healthcare Res Inst, Healthcare Syst, Gangnam Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
Purpose: A rectourethral fistula (RUF) is an uncommon complication resulting from surgery, radiation or trauma. Although various surgical procedures for the treatment of an RUF have been described, none has gained acceptance as the procedure of choice. The aim of this study was to review our experience with surgical management of RUF. Methods: The outcomes of 6 male patients (mean age, 51 years) with an RUF who were operated on by a single surgeon between May 2005 and July 2012 were assessed. Results: The causes of the RUF were iatrogenic in four cases (two after radiation therapy for rectal cancer, one after brachytherapy for prostate cancer, and one after surgery for a bladder stone) and traumatic in two cases. Fecal diversion was the initial treatment in five patients. In one patient, fecal diversion was performed simultaneously with definitive repair. Four patients underwent staged repair after a mean of 12 months. Rectal advancement flaps were done for simple, small fistula (n = 2), and flap interpositions (gracilis muscle flap, n = 2; omental flap, n = 1) were done for complex or recurrent fistulae. Urinary strictures and incontinence were observed in patients after gracilis muscle flap interposition, but they were resolved with simple treatments. The mean follow-up period was 28 months, and closure of the fistula was achieved in all five patients (100%) who underwent definitive repairs. The fistula persisted in one patient who refused further definitive surgery after receiving only a fecal diversion. Conclusion: Depending on the severity and the recurrence status of RUF, a relatively simple rectal advancement flap repair or a more complex gracilis muscle or omental flap interposition can be used to achieve closure of the fistula.