Focal liver lesions detection and characterization: The advantages of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI

被引:28
作者
Palmucci, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Policlin Vittorio Emanuele, Radiodiagnost & Radiotherapy Unit, Via Santa Sofia 78, I-95123 Catania, Italy
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Liver; Image enhancement; Gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; Carcinoma; Hepatocellular;
D O I
10.4254/wjh.v6.i7.477
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Since its clinical introduction, several studies in literature have investigated gadolinium ethoxybenzhyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid or gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) properties. Following contrast injection, it provides dynamic vascular phases (arterial, portal and equilibrium phases) and hepatobiliary phase, the latter due to its uptake by functional hepatocytes. The main advantages of Gd-EOB-DTPA of focal liver lesion detection and characterization are discussed in this paper. Namely, we focus on the possibility of distinguishing focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatic adenoma (HA), the identification of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the pre-operative assessment of metastasis in liver parenchyma. Regarding the differentiation between FNH and HA, adenoma typically appears hypointense in hepatobiliary phase, whereas FNH is isointense or hyperintense to the surrounding hepatic parenchyma. As for the identification of early HCCs, many papers recently published in literature have emphasized the contribution of hepatobiliary phase in the characterization of nodules without a typical hallmark of HCC. Atypical nodules (no hypervascularizaton observed on arterial phase and/or no hypovascular appearance on portal phase) with low signal intensity in the hepatobiliary phase, have a high probability of malignancy. Finally, regarding the evaluation of focal hepatic metastases, magnetic resonance pre-operative assessment using gadoxetic acid allows for more accurate diagnosis. (c) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 485
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   HEPATIC METASTASES - BASIC PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RADIOLOGISTS [J].
BAKER, ME ;
PELLEY, R .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (02) :329-337
[2]  
Baranes L, 2013, Diagn Interv Imaging, V94, P677, DOI 10.1016/j.diii.2013.05.002
[3]   Focal liver lesions: MR imaging-pathologic correlation [J].
Bartolozzi, C ;
Cioni, D ;
Donati, F ;
Lencioni, R .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (08) :1374-1388
[4]   Detection and classification of different liver lesions: Comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI versus multiphasic spiral CT in a clinica single centre investigation [J].
Boettcher, Joachim ;
Hansch, Andreas ;
Pfeil, Alexander ;
Schmidt, Peter ;
Malich, Ansgar ;
Schneeweiss, Albrecht ;
Maurer, Martin H. ;
Streitparth, Florian ;
Teichgraeber, Ulf K. ;
Renze, Diane M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (11) :1860-1869
[5]  
BOULAHDOUR H, 1993, J NUCL MED, V34, P2105
[6]   Hepatic metastases: use of diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging [J].
Bruegel, Melanie ;
Rummeny, Ernst J. .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2010, 35 (04) :454-461
[7]   Management of hepatoceullular carcinoma [J].
Bruix, J ;
Sherman, M .
HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (05) :1208-1236
[8]   Differentiation between dysplastic nodule and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: The utility of conventional MR imaging [J].
Chou, Chen-Te ;
Chou, Jung-Mao ;
Chang, Ting-An ;
Huang, Shiu-Feng ;
Chen, Chia-Bang ;
Chen, Yao-Li ;
Chen, Ran-Chou .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (42) :7433-7439
[9]   EVALUATION OF RADIATION-INDUCED LIVER-INJURY WITH MR-IMAGING - COMPARISON OF HEPATOCELLULAR AND RETICULOENDOTHELIAL CONTRAST AGENTS [J].
CLEMENT, O ;
MUHLER, A ;
VEXLER, VS ;
ROSENAU, W ;
BERTHEZENE, Y ;
KUWATSURU, R ;
BRASCH, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (01) :163-168
[10]  
CLEMENT O, 1992, INVEST RADIOL, V27, P612