Updated Classification System for Proximal Humeral Fractures

被引:10
作者
Mora Guix, Jose [1 ,2 ]
Sala Pedros, Juan [3 ]
Castano Serrano, Alejandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Terrassa, Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol Dept, Shoulder Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Orthopaed Surg Clin Sagrada Familia Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Terrassa, Sci Director Surg Dept, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Classification system; Diagnosis; Fracture; Humerus; Image; Proximal humeral fractures; Treatment;
D O I
10.3121/cmr.2009.779
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Proximal humeral fractures can restrict daily activities and, therefore, deserve efficient diagnoses that minimize complications and sequels. For good diagnosis and treatment, patient characteristics, variability in the forms of the fractures presented, and the technical difficulties in achieving fair results with surgical treatment should all be taken into account. Current classification systems for these fractures are based on anatomical and pathological principles, and not on systematic image reading. These fractures can appear in many different forms, with many characteristics that must be identified. However, many current classification systems lack good reliability, both interobserver and intra-observer for different image types. A new approach to image reading, following a well-designed set and sequence of variables to check, is needed. We previously reported such an image reading system. In the present study, we report a classification system based on this image reading system. Here we define 21 fracture characteristics and apply them along with classical Codman approaches to classify fractures. We base this novel classification system for classifying proximal humeral fractures on a review of scientific literature and improvements to our image reading protocol. Patient status, fracture characteristics and surgeon circumstances have been important issues in developing this system.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 44
页数:13
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Ackermann C, 1986, Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed Berufskr, V79, P209
[2]  
Alffram PA, 1964, ACTA ORTHOP SCAN S65, V65, P1, DOI DOI 10.3109/ORT.1964.35.SUPPL-65.01
[3]   EVANS CLASSIFICATION OF TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES - AN ASSESSMENT OF THE INTEROBSERVER AND INTRAOBSERVER RELIABILITY [J].
ANDERSEN, E ;
JORGENSEN, LG ;
HEDEDAM, LT .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1990, 21 (06) :377-378
[4]   Systematic reviews of nonrandomized clinical studies in the orthopaedic literature [J].
Audigé, L ;
Bhandari, M ;
Griffin, D ;
Middleton, P ;
Reeves, BC .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (427) :249-257
[5]   How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications?: A systematic review of their methodologies [J].
Audigé, L ;
Bhandari, M ;
Kellam, J .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 75 (02) :184-194
[6]  
Bauer GCH., 1960, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V17, P219
[7]  
BENGNER U, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P179
[8]   SATISFACTION OF SEARCH IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY [J].
BERBAUM, KS ;
FRANKEN, EA ;
DORFMAN, DD ;
ROOHOLAMINI, SA ;
KATHOL, MH ;
BARLOON, TJ ;
BEHLKE, FM ;
SATO, Y ;
LU, CH ;
ELKHOURY, GY ;
FLICKINGER, FW ;
MONTGOMERY, WJ .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (02) :133-140
[9]   Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs [J].
Bernstein, J ;
Adler, LM ;
Blank, JE ;
Dalsey, RM ;
Williams, GR ;
Iannotti, JP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (09) :1371-1375
[10]   Taxonomy and treatment - a classification of fracture classifications [J].
Bernstein, J ;
Monaghan, BA ;
Silber, JS ;
DeLong, WG .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (05) :706-707