Research in spinal surgery: Evaluation and practice of evidence-based medicine

被引:10
作者
Oppenlander, Mark E. [1 ,2 ]
Maulucci, Christopher M. [1 ]
Ghobrial, George M. [1 ]
Harrop, James S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] St Joseph Hosp & Med Ctr, Barrow Neurol Inst, Div Neurol Surg, Phoenix, AZ 85003 USA
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS | 2014年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Spinal surgery; Trial design; Research; Methodology;
D O I
10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.89
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a common concept among medical practitioners, yet unique challenges arise when EBM is applied to spinal surgery. Due to the relative rarity of certain spinal disorders, and a lack of management equipoise, randomized controlled trials may be difficult to execute. Despite this, responsibility rests with spinal surgeons to design high quality studies in order to justify certain treatment modalities. The authors therefore review the tenets of implementing evidence-based research, through the lens of spinal disorders. The process of EBM begins with asking the correct question. An appropriate study is then designed based on the research question. Understanding study designs allows the spinal surgeon to assess the level of evidence provided. Validated outcome measurements allow clinicians to communicate the success of treatment strategies, and will increase the quality of a given study design. Importantly, one must recognize that the randomized controlled trial is not always the optimal study design for a given research question. Rather, prospective observational cohort studies may be more appropriate in certain circumstances, and would provide superior generalizability. Despite the challenges involved with EBM, it is the future of medicine. These issues surrounding EBM are important for spinal surgeons, as well as health policy makers and editorial boards, to have familiarity. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 93
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   An Evidence-Based Approach to Spine Surgery [J].
Allen, R. Todd ;
Rihn, Jeffrey A. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Currier, Bradford ;
Albert, Todd J. ;
Phillips, Frank M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2009, 24 (06) :15S-24S
[2]   Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis [J].
Bago, Juan ;
Perez-Grueso, Francisco J. S. ;
Les, Esther ;
Hernandez, Pablo ;
Pellise, Ferran .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (12) :1898-1904
[3]   CERVICAL LAMINECTOMY AND DENTATE LIGAMENT SECTION FOR CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY [J].
BENZEL, EC ;
LANCON, J ;
KESTERSON, L ;
HADDEN, T .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1991, 4 (03) :286-295
[4]   TESTING THE VALIDITY OF THE EUROQOL AND COMPARING IT WITH THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
BRAZIER, J ;
JONES, N ;
KIND, P .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (03) :169-180
[5]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[6]   Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression [J].
Chiles, BW ;
Leonard, MA ;
Choudhri, HF ;
Cooper, PR .
NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 44 (04) :762-769
[7]   The Pros and Cons of Evidence-Based Medicine [J].
Croft, Peter ;
Malmivaara, Antti ;
van Tulder, Maurits .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (17) :E1121-E1125
[8]   Methods for the Systematic Reviews on Patient Safety During Spine Surgery [J].
Dettori, Joseph R. ;
Norvell, Daniel C. ;
Dekutoski, Mark ;
Fisher, Charles ;
Chapman, Jens R. .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (09) :S22-S27
[9]   Outcome measures for low back pain research - A proposal for standardized use [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Battie, M ;
Beurskens, AJHM ;
Bombardier, C ;
Croft, P ;
Koes, B ;
Malmivaara, A ;
Roland, M ;
Von Korff, M ;
Waddell, G .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :2003-2013
[10]   The Oswestry Disability Index [J].
Fairbank, JCT ;
Pynsent, PB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) :2940-2952