Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second language writing

被引:47
作者
Crossley, Scott A. [1 ]
McNamara, Danielle S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Dept Appl Linguist, 34 Peachtree St Suite 1200,One Pk Tower Bldg, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, Psychol Inst Intelligent Syst, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
writing assessment; cohesion; essay quality; lexical development; syntactic development; computational linguistics;
D O I
10.1504/IJCEELL.2011.040197
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article reviews recent studies in which human judgements of essay quality are assessed using Coh-Metrix, an automated text analysis tool. The goal of these studies is to better understand the relationship between linguistic features of essays and human judgements of writing quality. Coh-Metrix reports on a wide range of linguistic features, affording analyses of writing at various levels of text structure, including surface, text-base, and situation model levels. Recent studies have examined linguistic features of essay quality related to co-reference, connectives, syntactic complexity, lexical diversity, spatiality, temporality, and lexical characteristics. These studies have analysed essays written by both first language and second language writers. The results support the notion that human judgements of essay quality are best predicted by linguistic indices that correlate with measures of language sophistication such as lexical diversity, word frequency, and syntactic complexity. In contrast, human judgements of essay quality are not strongly predicted by linguistic indices related to cohesion. Overall, the studies portray high quality writing as containing more complex language that may not facilitate text comprehension.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 191
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING OF RELATIONSHIPS AMONG DEVELOPMENTAL SKILLS AND WRITING SKILLS IN PRIMARY-GRADE AND INTERMEDIATE-GRADE WRITERS [J].
ABBOTT, RD ;
BERNINGER, VW .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 85 (03) :478-508
[2]   Longitudinal Relationships of Levels of Language in Writing and Between Writing and Reading in Grades 1 to 7 [J].
Abbott, Robert D. ;
Berninger, Virginia W. ;
Fayol, Michel .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 102 (02) :281-298
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, PSYCHOL READING LANG
[4]  
Baayen R. H., 1995, CELEX LEXICAL DATABA
[5]   LOWER-LEVEL DEVELOPMENTAL SKILLS IN BEGINNING WRITING [J].
BERNINGER, V ;
YATES, C ;
CARTWRIGHT, A ;
RUTBERG, J ;
REMY, E ;
ABBOTT, R .
READING AND WRITING, 1992, 4 (03) :257-280
[6]   Growth in Phonological, Orthographic, and Morphological Awareness in Grades 1 to 6 [J].
Berninger, Virginia W. ;
Abbott, Robert D. ;
Nagy, William ;
Carlisle, Joanne .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2010, 39 (02) :141-163
[7]   THEORY-BASED DIAGNOSIS AND REMEDIATION OF WRITING DISABILITIES [J].
BERNINGER, VW ;
MIZOKAWA, DT ;
BRAGG, R .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 29 (01) :57-79
[8]  
Charniak E, 2000, 6TH APPLIED NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING CONFERENCE/1ST MEETING OF THE NORTH AMERICAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANLP-NAACL 2000 STUDENT RESEARCH WORKSHOP, pA132
[9]  
Collins J.L., 1998, STRATEGIES STRUGGLIN
[10]   THE MRC PSYCHOLINGUISTIC DATABASE [J].
COLTHEART, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 33 (NOV) :497-505