Avoiding Revenge Using Optimal Opponent Ranking Strategy in the Board Game Catan

被引:1
作者
Boda, Marton Attila [1 ]
机构
[1] Szent Istvan Univ, Godollo, Hungary
关键词
Agent; Board Game; Catan; Game; Opponent Ranking; Optimal Strategy; Player; Revenge; Simulation;
D O I
10.4018/IJGCMS.2018040103
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The study analyses the attitude of players in a board game called Catan. In Catan, we are basically handling the players as opponents, but this does not rule out the possibility of cooperation. In a game with three players, in order to increase the chances of winning, it is worth acting together against the lead player. Cooperation has several possible modalities. In the article, the focus is on blocking situations which can lead to revenge. The primary objectives of this study were to examine how different types of thinking can cause revenge situations and which are the successful strategies among players. Strategies (as a mathematical solution to a decision problem) are examined in the study via computer modeling. To help the model, some kind of behavior of human Catan players was studied which enables profiling gaming styles used in the model. The winning chances of the player who was not involved in revenge have improved considerably, by 43%. To avoid being involved in revenge situations, the best solution is to accept other players' opponent ranking methods.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 70
页数:24
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Aquino K, 2001, J APPL PSYCHOL, V86, P52, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.52
[2]   Angry memories and thoughts of revenge: The relationship between forgiveness and anger rumination [J].
Barber, L ;
Maltby, J ;
Macaskill, A .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 39 (02) :253-262
[3]   VICTIMS RESPONSES TO APOLOGIES - THE EFFECTS OF OFFENDER RESPONSIBILITY AND OFFENSE SEVERITY [J].
BENNETT, M ;
EARWAKER, D .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 134 (04) :457-464
[4]  
Bies R.J., 1997, ANTISOCIAL BEHAV ORG
[5]   The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace [J].
Bradfield, M ;
Aquino, K .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1999, 25 (05) :607-631
[6]  
Buss A.H, 1961, PSYCHOL AGGRESSION, DOI 10.1037/11160-000
[7]   The Paradoxical Consequences of Revenge [J].
Carlsmith, Kevin M. ;
Wilson, Timothy D. ;
Gilbert, Daniel T. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 95 (06) :1316-1324
[8]   CHILDRENS REACTIONS TO APOLOGIES [J].
DARBY, BW ;
SCHLENKER, BR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 43 (04) :742-753
[9]   Getting Even or Getting Equal? Retributive Desires and Transitional Justice [J].
David, Roman ;
Choi, Susanne Y. P. .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 30 (02) :161-192
[10]  
Elias G.S., 2012, CHARACTERISTICS GAME