GENETIC-ANALYSIS AND SELECTION FOR WHEAT YIELD IN DROUGHT-STRESSED AND IRRIGATED ENVIRONMENTS

被引:62
作者
UDDIN, N
CARVER, BF
CLUTTER, AC
机构
[1] OKLAHOMA STATE UNIV,DEPT AGRON,STILLWATER,OK 74078
[2] OKLAHOMA STATE UNIV,DEPT ANIM SCI,STILLWATER,OK 74078
关键词
TRITICUM-AESTIVUM; WHEAT; STRESS TOLERANCE; GENETIC VARIANCE; GENETIC CORRELATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00037933
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grown in the southern Great Plains of the U.S.A. are exposed to a wide range of moisture conditions due to large fluctuations in the amount and frequency of rainfall. Yield stability under those conditions is therefore a desirable trait for wheat breeders. Our primary objective was to quantify various genetic parameters for grain production in drought-stressed and irrigated environments. We also attempted to predict and measure yield responses when selection is practiced in either drought-stressed or irrigated environments, or both. Seventy F2-derived lines from the cross, TAM W-101/Sturdy, were evaluated at Goodwell, OK, under irrigated and naturally drought-stressed conditions in 1987 and 1988. Genetic variance and heritability estimates were higher in the irrigated environment than in the drought-stressed environment. The genetic correlation coefficient for yields in the two environments was 0.20 +/- 0.16, indicating that selection of widely adapted genotypes requires testing in both environments. Based on the genetic variance/covariance structure of this particular population, the linear index which maximized the combined expected gain in both environments was 0.66Y1 + 0.34Y2, in which Y1 and Y2 are yields in the irrigated and drought-stressed environments. This index is not expected to apply across all populations; rather, it further supports the hypothesis that testing in either environment alone (drought stressed or irrigated) may not be most effective for increasing either mean productivity or yield under drought stress.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 96
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   OPTIMAL ENVIRONMENTS FOR YIELD TESTING [J].
ALLEN, FL ;
COMSTOCK, RE ;
RASMUSSON, DC .
CROP SCIENCE, 1978, 18 (05) :747-751
[2]   DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF MAIZE (ZEA-MAYS-L) TO MASS SELECTION IN DIVERSE SELECTION ENVIRONMENTS [J].
ARBOLEDARIVERA, F ;
COMPTON, WA .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1974, 44 (02) :77-81
[3]   PREDICTING THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECT VERSUS INDIRECT SELECTION FOR OAT YIELD IN 3 TYPES OF STRESS ENVIRONMENTS [J].
ATLIN, GN ;
FREY, KJ .
EUPHYTICA, 1989, 44 (1-2) :137-142
[4]  
BLUM A, 1985, BREEDING CROP VARIET
[5]   STRESS TOLERANCE AND ADAPTATION IN SPRING WHEAT [J].
BRUCKNER, PL ;
FROHBERG, RC .
CROP SCIENCE, 1987, 27 (01) :31-36
[6]  
CECCARELLI S, 1989, EUPHYTICA, V40, P197
[7]   YIELD POTENTIAL AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE OF SEGREGATING POPULATIONS OF BARLEY IN CONTRASTING ENVIRONMENTS [J].
CECCARELLI, S .
EUPHYTICA, 1987, 36 (01) :265-273
[8]  
Ceccarelli S., 1987, DROUGHT TOLERANCE WI, P101
[9]  
COX TS, 1985, COEFFICIENTS PARENTA, P24
[10]  
DULEY FL, 1955, YB AGR, P407