ICMSF METHODS STUDIES .12. COMPARATIVE-STUDY FOR THE ENUMERATION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-PERFRINGENS IN FECES

被引:16
作者
HAUSCHILD, AHW
DESMARCHELIER, P
GILBERT, RJ
HARMON, SM
VAHLEFELD, R
机构
[1] LANDESANSTALT VET MED & LEBENSMITTELHYG BERLIN,D-1000 BERLIN 21,FED REP GER
[2] UNIV SYDNEY,SCH PUBL HLTH & TROP MED,SYDNEY 2006,NEW S WALES,AUSTRALIA
[3] CENT PUBL HLTH LAB,FOOD HYG LAB,LONDON NW9 5HT,ENGLAND
[4] US FDA,PUBL HLTH SERV,WASHINGTON,DC 20204
关键词
D O I
10.1139/m79-146
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
As the second phase of an international comparative study for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens, four methods were compared for 'total' and spore counts of C. perfringens in fecal specimens: the SFP (Shahidi-Ferguson perfringens) agar(A), TSC (tryptose-sulfite-cycloserine) agar (B), SC (sulfite-cycloserine) agar (C), and neomycin blood agar (D) methods. In both the total and spore count procedures, the confirmed C. perfringens counts in methods D were lower than in methods A, B, and C. Little differences among methods were found in the percentages of presumptive colonies confirmed as C. perfringens. The nonspecific counts in methods A and D were generally greater than in B and C, but nonspecific microorganisms did not interfere in the enumeration of C. perfringens spores by any of the four methods. In overall performance, methods B and C were superior to A and D. The mean C. perfringens spore count was only 0.17 log lower than the mean total count. Spore counts alone are, therefore, adequate in investigations of C. perfringens outbreaks.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 963
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条