LAPAROSCOPIC EXTRAPERITONEAL RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: OUR FIRST EXPERIENCES

被引:0
作者
Oktay, Bulent [1 ]
Vuruskan, Hakan [1 ]
Yavascaoglu, Ismet [1 ]
Kordan, Yakup [1 ]
Caliskan, Zulkuf [1 ]
Ozturk, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Tip Fak, Urol Anabilim Dali, Bursa, Turkey
来源
TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2005年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
Prostate cancer; laparoscopic extra peritoneal radical prostatectomy; clinical experience;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a relatively new and contemporary approach in the surgical management of localized prostate cancer. We report our preliminary results after 6 procedures. Materials and Methods: We performed laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (LERP) in 6 patients between January and June in 2004. Clinical stage, serum PSA, Gleason score, operating time, surgical and medical complications, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay and catheterization times were recorded. The pathologic stage (1997 TNM classification), status of surgical margins and continence were noted. Results: There was no conversion and reintervention. The mean operation time was 320 minutes. The mean blood loss was 178.3 ml. The mean hospital stay was 4.5 days. There were no major complications. Subileus occurred in one patient and resolved spontaneously. The mean catheterization time was 13.3 days. 2 of 6 patients had positive surgical margins at the urethra. 4 of 6 patients were continent after a median followup period of 3 months. Conclusion: LERP as a minimally invasive procedure seems to offer the same early oncological and surgical results as conventional open radical prostatectomy. Long and gradual learning curve of this procedure is its main disadvantage.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 388
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary results [J].
Abbou, CC ;
Salomon, L ;
Hoznek, A ;
Antiphon, P ;
Cicco, A ;
Saint, F ;
Alame, W ;
Bellot, J ;
Chopin, DK .
UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (05) :630-633
[2]  
Abreu SC, 2002, J UROLOGY, V167, P19
[3]  
Apaydin E, 2004, UL UR K KIT, V52
[4]   Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy [J].
Artibani, W ;
Grosso, G ;
Novara, G ;
Pecoraro, G ;
Sidoti, O ;
Sarti, A ;
Ficarra, V .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 44 (04) :401-406
[5]   Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A false debate over a real challenge [J].
Cathelineau, X ;
Cahill, D ;
Widmer, H ;
Rozet, F ;
Baumert, H ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (02) :714-716
[6]   Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis [J].
Erdogru, T ;
Teber, D ;
Frede, T ;
Marrero, R ;
Hammady, A ;
Seemann, O ;
Rassweiler, J .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 46 (03) :312-319
[7]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary pathologic evaluation [J].
Fromont, G ;
Guillonneau, B ;
Validire, P ;
Vallancien, G .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (04) :661-665
[8]   Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The montsouris 3-year experience [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
Rozet, F ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Lay, F ;
Barret, E ;
Doublet, JD ;
Baumert, H ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (01) :51-56
[9]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Assessment after 240 procedures [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
Rozet, F ;
Barret, E ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Vallancien, G .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (01) :189-+
[10]  
Guillonneau B, 2000, J UROLOGY, V163, P1643, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67512-X