Patient Experiences in Selecting a Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan

被引:14
作者
Stults, Cheryl D. [1 ]
Baskin, Alison S. [2 ]
Bundorf, M. Kate [3 ]
Tai-Seale, Ming [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Palo Alto Med Fdn Res Inst, 2350 W El Camino Real,4th Floor, Mountain View, CA 94040 USA
[2] NIH, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE | 2018年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
Medicare Part D; medical decision-making; qualitative methods; patient perspectives/narratives;
D O I
10.1177/2374373517739413
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Medicare beneficiaries often report that the process of choosing a prescription drug plan is frustrating and confusing and many do not enroll in the plan that covers their drugs at the lowest cost. Methods: We conducted 4 focus groups to understand beneficiaries' experiences in selecting a drug plan to identify what resources and factors were most important to them. Participants were patients served by a multispecialty delivery system and were primarily affluent and Caucasian. Results: While low cost was essential to many, other characteristics like having the same plan as a partner, company reputation, convenience, and anticipation of possible future health problems were sometimes more important. Although some used resources including insurance brokers, counselors, and websites beyond Medicare.gov, many expressed a desire for greater assistance with and greater simplicity in the choice process. Conclusion: Although older adults would likely benefit from greater assistance in choosing Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, more research is necessary to understand how to help with decision-making in this context.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 152
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Abaluck JT, 2009, CHOICE INCONSISTEN D
  • [2] Choice Set Size and Decision Making: The Case of Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plans
    Bundorf, M. Kate
    Szrek, Helena
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 30 (05) : 582 - 593
  • [3] Medicare part D information seeking: The role of recognition of need and patient activation
    Butler, Melissa G.
    Farley, Joel F.
    Sleath, Betsy L.
    Murray, Michael D.
    Maciejewski, Matthew L.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2012, 8 (05) : 433 - 442
  • [4] PDP or MA-PD? Medicare part D enrollment decisions in CMS Region 25
    Cline, Richard R.
    Worley, Marcia M.
    Schondelmeyer, Stephen W.
    Schommer, Jon C.
    Larson, Tom A.
    Uden, Donald L.
    Hadsall, Ronald S.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2010, 6 (02) : 130 - 142
  • [5] De Natale Mary Lou, 2007, Policy Polit Nurs Pract, V8, P170, DOI 10.1177/1527154407309048
  • [6] The role of satisfaction and switching costs in Medicare Part D choices
    Han, Jayoung
    Ko, Dong Woo
    Urmie, Julie M.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2014, 10 (02) : 398 - 407
  • [7] Can limiting choice increase social welfare? The elderly and health insurance
    Hanoch, Y
    Rice, T
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2006, 84 (01) : 37 - 73
  • [8] Bounded rationality, emotions and older adult decision making: Not so fast and yet so frugal
    Hanoch, Yaniv
    Wood, Stacey
    Rice, Thomas
    [J]. HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 50 (06) : 333 - 358
  • [9] How Much Choice Is Too Much? The Case of the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit
    Hanoch, Yaniv
    Rice, Thomas
    Cummings, Janet
    Wood, Stacey
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 44 (04) : 1157 - 1168
  • [10] Who failed to enroll in Medicare Part D, and why? Early results
    Heiss, Florian
    McFadden, Daniel
    Winter, Joachim
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (05) : W344 - W354