Patient Experiences in Selecting a Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan

被引:15
作者
Stults, Cheryl D. [1 ]
Baskin, Alison S. [2 ]
Bundorf, M. Kate [3 ]
Tai-Seale, Ming [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Palo Alto Med Fdn Res Inst, 2350 W El Camino Real,4th Floor, Mountain View, CA 94040 USA
[2] NIH, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE | 2018年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
Medicare Part D; medical decision-making; qualitative methods; patient perspectives/narratives;
D O I
10.1177/2374373517739413
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Medicare beneficiaries often report that the process of choosing a prescription drug plan is frustrating and confusing and many do not enroll in the plan that covers their drugs at the lowest cost. Methods: We conducted 4 focus groups to understand beneficiaries' experiences in selecting a drug plan to identify what resources and factors were most important to them. Participants were patients served by a multispecialty delivery system and were primarily affluent and Caucasian. Results: While low cost was essential to many, other characteristics like having the same plan as a partner, company reputation, convenience, and anticipation of possible future health problems were sometimes more important. Although some used resources including insurance brokers, counselors, and websites beyond Medicare.gov, many expressed a desire for greater assistance with and greater simplicity in the choice process. Conclusion: Although older adults would likely benefit from greater assistance in choosing Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, more research is necessary to understand how to help with decision-making in this context.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 152
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Abaluck JT, 2009, CHOICE INCONSISTEN D
[2]   Choice Set Size and Decision Making: The Case of Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plans [J].
Bundorf, M. Kate ;
Szrek, Helena .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 30 (05) :582-593
[3]   Medicare part D information seeking: The role of recognition of need and patient activation [J].
Butler, Melissa G. ;
Farley, Joel F. ;
Sleath, Betsy L. ;
Murray, Michael D. ;
Maciejewski, Matthew L. .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2012, 8 (05) :433-442
[4]   PDP or MA-PD? Medicare part D enrollment decisions in CMS Region 25 [J].
Cline, Richard R. ;
Worley, Marcia M. ;
Schondelmeyer, Stephen W. ;
Schommer, Jon C. ;
Larson, Tom A. ;
Uden, Donald L. ;
Hadsall, Ronald S. .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2010, 6 (02) :130-142
[5]  
De Natale Mary Lou, 2007, Policy Polit Nurs Pract, V8, P170, DOI 10.1177/1527154407309048
[6]   The role of satisfaction and switching costs in Medicare Part D choices [J].
Han, Jayoung ;
Ko, Dong Woo ;
Urmie, Julie M. .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2014, 10 (02) :398-407
[7]   Can limiting choice increase social welfare? The elderly and health insurance [J].
Hanoch, Y ;
Rice, T .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2006, 84 (01) :37-73
[8]   Bounded rationality, emotions and older adult decision making: Not so fast and yet so frugal [J].
Hanoch, Yaniv ;
Wood, Stacey ;
Rice, Thomas .
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 50 (06) :333-358
[9]   How Much Choice Is Too Much? The Case of the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit [J].
Hanoch, Yaniv ;
Rice, Thomas ;
Cummings, Janet ;
Wood, Stacey .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 44 (04) :1157-1168
[10]   Who failed to enroll in Medicare Part D, and why? Early results [J].
Heiss, Florian ;
McFadden, Daniel ;
Winter, Joachim .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (05) :W344-W354