Scientific misconduct and research ethics in economics: an introduction

被引:4
作者
Yalcintas, Altug [1 ]
Wible, James R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Fac Polit Sci, Econ Dept, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Peter T Paul Coll Business & Econ, Durham, NH 03824 USA
关键词
Research ethics; scientific misconduct; economics of scientific knowledge; questionable research practices; intellectual path dependence in economics;
D O I
10.1080/00346764.2016.1150731
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since the screening of Inside Job in movie theatres around the world in 2010, research integrity in economics has been questioned by scholars and public intellectuals. Prestigious economists and policy makers are accused of conflicts of interest while prominent economists are charged with plagiarism and self-plagiarism. Some of these economists replied to accusations about themselves while many others have preferred not to respond at all. These days, economists hear the following question more often than before: "what is wrong with economics?".
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Ferguson C. J., 2010, CHRONICLE HIGHER ED
[2]   Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff [J].
Herndon, Thomas ;
Ash, Michael ;
Pollin, Robert .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2014, 38 (02) :257-279
[3]  
Lanteri A., 2014, EC EC I SETTING INDI
[4]  
Stephan P., 2012, EC SHAPES SCI
[5]  
Wible J. R., 2014, EC SCI METHODOLOGY E
[6]  
Yalcintas A, 2016, INTELLECTUAL PATH DEPENDENCE IN ECONOMICS: WHY ECONOMISTS DO NOT REJECT REFUTED THEORIES, P1