How to understand and conduct evidence-based medicine

被引:29
作者
Kang, Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 102 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 06973, South Korea
关键词
Clinical epidemiology; Evidence-based medicine; Meta-analysis; Practice guideline; Systematic review;
D O I
10.4097/kjae.2016.69.5.435
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions regarding the care of individual patients. This concept has gained popularity recently, and its applications have been steadily expanding. Nowadays, the term "evidence-based" is used in numerous situations and conditions, such as evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice, evidence-based health care, evidence-based social work, evidence-based policy, and evidence-based education. However, many anesthesiologists and their colleagues have not previously been accustomed to utilizing EBM, and they have experienced difficulty in understanding and applying the techniques of EBM to their practice. In this article, the author discusses the brief history, definition, methods, and limitations of EBM. As EBM also involves making use of the best available information to answer questions in clinical practice, the author emphasizes the process of performing evidence-based medicine: generate the clinical question, find the best evidence, perform critical appraisal, apply the evidence, and then evaluate. Levels of evidence and strength of recommendation were also explained. The author expects that this article may be of assistance to readers in understanding, conducting, and evaluating EBM.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 445
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[2]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[3]  
Bidwell S., 2003, ETEXT HLTH TECHNOLOG
[4]  
Cochrane A, 1999, EFFECTIVENESS EFFICI, P1
[5]   THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL EVIDENCE - IMPLICATIONS FOR QUALITY OF CARE [J].
EDDY, DM ;
BILLINGS, J .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1988, 7 (01) :19-32
[6]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[7]   SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES OF THE MENACE OF DAILY LIFE [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR .
SCIENCE, 1988, 242 (4883) :1257-1263
[8]   ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM MULTICLINIC TRIALS [J].
FLEISS, JL .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (04) :267-275
[9]   EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE - A NEW APPROACH TO TEACHING THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE [J].
GUYATT, G .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (17) :2420-2425
[10]  
Guyatt GH, 1991, ACP J CLUB, V114, pA