A comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised trial

被引:25
作者
Singh, Anisha [1 ]
Bhalotra, Anju R. [1 ]
Anand, Raktima [1 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Med Coll, Dept Anesthesia, New Delhi, India
关键词
Anaesthesia; laryngeal mask; time; ventilation;
D O I
10.4103/ija.IJA_153_18
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Second-generation supraglottic airway devices are widely used in current anaesthesia practice. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate and compare laryngeal mask airway: ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), Supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) and I-gel. Methods: Eighty-four adult patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly allocated to three groups: group P (PLMA), group I (I-gel) and group S (SLMA) of 28 patients each. Insertion times, number of insertion attempts, haemodynamic response to insertion, ease of insertion of airway device and gastric tube, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were assessed. The primary outcome measure was the OLP after successful device insertion. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18.0 software using Chi-squared/Fisher's exact test (categorical data) and analysis of variance (continuous data) tests. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The demographic profile of patients was comparable. OLP measured after insertion, 30 minutes later and at the end of surgery differed significantly between the three groups (P < 0.001). The mean OLP was 32.64 +/- 4.14 cm center dot H2O in group P and 29.79 +/- 3.70 cm center dot H2O in group S. In group I, the mean OLP after insertion was 26.71 +/- 3.45 cm H2O, which increased to 27.36 +/- 3.22 cm H2O at 30 minutes and to 27.50 +/- 3.24 cm H2O towards the end of surgery. However, these increases were not statistically significant (P = 0.641). Device insertion time was longest for group P (P = 0.001) and gastric tube insertion time was longest for group I (P = 0.001). Haemodynamic response to insertion and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were similar with all three devices. Conclusion: PLMA provides better sealing pressure but takes longer to insert. I-gel and SLMA have similar sealing pressures. I-gel insertion time is quicker.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 864
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme (TM) Versus Unique (TM) in Edentulous Geriatric Patients [J].
Beydes, Tangul ;
Kucukguclu, Semih ;
Ozbilgin, Sule ;
Kuvaki, Bahar ;
Ademoglu, Meltem ;
Sari, Melek .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2016, 44 (01) :32-36
[42]   A study on cuff pressure of laryngeal mask for airway management of child patients undergoing operation [J].
Chen, Guangzhu ;
Sun, Baowen ;
Lin, Qi ;
Liu, Yang .
MINERVA PEDIATRICA, 2020, 72 (02) :89-94
[43]   A clinical trial evaluating the laryngeal mask airway-Supreme in obese children during general anesthesia [J].
Tian, Yue ;
Wu, Xiu-ying ;
Li, Lu ;
Ma, Ling ;
Li, Yun-feng .
ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 13 (01) :183-190
[44]   Laryngeal Mask Airway-Supreme™ (LMAS) in elective non-cardiac surgery: towards a more accurate quantification of difficult placement [J].
Wang, Mi ;
Argalious, Maged .
MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2021, 87 (05) :502-504
[45]   A comparison of deep vs. awake removal of the laryngeal mask airway in paediatric dental daycase surgery. A randomised controlled trial [J].
Dolling, S ;
Anders, NRK ;
Rolfe, SE .
ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 58 (12) :1224-1228
[46]   Laryngeal tube S II, laryngeal tube S disposable, Fastrach laryngeal mask and Fastrach laryngeal mask disposable during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison between reusable and disposable supraglottic airway devices [J].
Thee, Carsten ;
Serocki, Goetz ;
Doerges, Volker ;
Ilies, Christoph ;
Wallenius, Karsten ;
Bein, Berthold ;
Steinfath, Markus ;
Cavus, Erol .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (05) :468-472
[47]   A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation with Ambu® AuraGain™, Fastrach® and BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomised Clinical Trial [J].
Raiger, L. K. ;
Sharma, Bhawesh ;
Gehlot, Ravindra Kumar ;
Dhania, Swati ;
Meena, Hemant Kumar .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (09) :UC14-UC18
[48]   A Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Co-induction Agents to Propofol for Insertion of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomised Clinical Study [J].
Pal, Rashmi ;
Prem, Koti ;
Arora, K. K. ;
Gill, Rashpal Singh .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (05) :UC14-UC17
[49]   Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a conduit for fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients: A randomised comparative study [J].
Chauhan, Kanika ;
Kerai, Sukhyanti ;
Saxena, Kirti N. ;
Gupta, Lalit ;
Prathap, T. H. ;
Wadhawan, Sonia .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 69 (07) :687-692
[50]   I-GEL™ VS. AURAONCE™ LARYNGEAL MASK FOR GENERAL ANAESTHESIA WITH CONTROLLED VENTILATION IN PARALYZED PATIENTS [J].
Donaldson, William ;
Abraham, Alexander ;
Deighan, Mairead ;
Michalek, Pavel .
BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC, 2011, 155 (02) :155-163