A comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised trial

被引:24
作者
Singh, Anisha [1 ]
Bhalotra, Anju R. [1 ]
Anand, Raktima [1 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Med Coll, Dept Anesthesia, New Delhi, India
关键词
Anaesthesia; laryngeal mask; time; ventilation;
D O I
10.4103/ija.IJA_153_18
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Second-generation supraglottic airway devices are widely used in current anaesthesia practice. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate and compare laryngeal mask airway: ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), Supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) and I-gel. Methods: Eighty-four adult patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly allocated to three groups: group P (PLMA), group I (I-gel) and group S (SLMA) of 28 patients each. Insertion times, number of insertion attempts, haemodynamic response to insertion, ease of insertion of airway device and gastric tube, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were assessed. The primary outcome measure was the OLP after successful device insertion. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18.0 software using Chi-squared/Fisher's exact test (categorical data) and analysis of variance (continuous data) tests. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The demographic profile of patients was comparable. OLP measured after insertion, 30 minutes later and at the end of surgery differed significantly between the three groups (P < 0.001). The mean OLP was 32.64 +/- 4.14 cm center dot H2O in group P and 29.79 +/- 3.70 cm center dot H2O in group S. In group I, the mean OLP after insertion was 26.71 +/- 3.45 cm H2O, which increased to 27.36 +/- 3.22 cm H2O at 30 minutes and to 27.50 +/- 3.24 cm H2O towards the end of surgery. However, these increases were not statistically significant (P = 0.641). Device insertion time was longest for group P (P = 0.001) and gastric tube insertion time was longest for group I (P = 0.001). Haemodynamic response to insertion and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were similar with all three devices. Conclusion: PLMA provides better sealing pressure but takes longer to insert. I-gel and SLMA have similar sealing pressures. I-gel insertion time is quicker.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 864
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The Laryngeal Mask Airway SupremeTM- a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSealTM in paralysed, anaesthetised patients [J].
Eschertzhuber, S. ;
Brimacombe, J. ;
Hohlrieder, M. ;
Keller, C. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 64 (01) :79-83
[22]   Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model [J].
Schmidbauer, W. ;
Bercker, S. ;
Volk, T. ;
Bogusch, G. ;
Mager, G. ;
Kerner, T. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 102 (01) :135-139
[23]   Fiberoptic intubation of severely obese patients through supraglottic airway: A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask vs the i-gel™ airway [J].
Moser, Berthold ;
Keller, Christian ;
Audige, Laurent ;
Dave, Mital H. ;
Bruppacher, Heinz R. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 63 (02) :187-194
[24]   Neonatal resuscitation using a laryngeal mask airway: a randomised trial in Uganda [J].
Pejovic, Nicolas J. ;
Trevisanuto, Daniele ;
Lubulwa, Clare ;
Hook, Susanna Myrnerts ;
Cavallin, Francesco ;
Byamugisha, Josaphat ;
Nankunda, Jolly ;
Tylleskar, Thorkild .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2018, 103 (03) :255-260
[25]   The Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway™ (LMA): A new neonatal supraglottic device: Comparison with Classic and ProSeal LMA in a manikin [J].
Trevisanuto, Daniele ;
Parotto, Matteo ;
Doglioni, Nicoletta ;
Ori, Carlo ;
Zanardo, Vincenzo ;
Micaglio, Massimo .
RESUSCITATION, 2012, 83 (01) :97-100
[26]   Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway versus Face Mask during Neonatal Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Trevisanuto, Daniele ;
Cavallin, Francesco ;
Loi Ngoc Nguyen ;
Tien Viet Nguyen ;
Linh Dieu Tran ;
Chien Dinh Tran ;
Doglioni, Nicoletta ;
Micaglio, Massimo ;
Moccia, Luciano .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2015, 167 (02) :286-+
[27]   Clinical Evaluation of the Cricoid Pressure Effect on Bag Mask Ventilation, ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Placement and Ventilation [J].
Joshi, Shobha ;
Prakash, Smita ;
Mullick, Parul ;
Usha, Ganapathy ;
Pawar, Mridula .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2018, 46 (05) :381-387
[28]   The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway size selection in male and female patients in an Asian population [J].
Tan, SM ;
Sim, YY ;
Koay, CK .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2005, 33 (02) :239-242
[29]   Evaluation of performance of Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (TM), Laryngeal Mask Airway-ProSeal and endotracheal tube in prone position: A prospective, randomised study [J].
Hegde, Harihar Vishwanath ;
Bandi, Joshiraj ;
Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S. ;
Honnannavar, Kiran A. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (03) :173-181
[30]   Randomised Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme, i-gel and Current Practice in the Initial Airway Management of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (REVIVE-Airways): Clinical Outcomes [J].
Benger, Jonathan R. ;
Coates, David ;
Davies, Sian E. ;
Greenwood, Rosemary ;
Rhys, Megan ;
Thomas, Matthew ;
Voss, Sarah ;
Nolan, Jerry P. .
CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (24) :2720-2720