CONCERNING EINSTEINS, PODOLSKYS, AND ROSENS OBJECTION TO QUANTUM THEORY

[1] ALEXANDROW AD, 1952, P ACAD SCI USSR, V84, P253

[2] FURTHER DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE EXPERIMENTAL TESTS FOR THE PARADOX OF EINSTEIN, PODOLSKY AND ROSEN [J]. NUOVO CIMENTO, 1960, 17 (06): : 964 - 976

[3] DISCUSSION OF EXPERIMENTAL PROOF FOR THE PARADOX OF EINSTEIN, ROSEN, AND PODOLSKY [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1957, 108 (04): : 1070 - 1076

[4] Bohm D., 1951, QUANTUM THEORY

[5] BOHM D, 1962, OBSERVATION INTERPRE, P86

[6] Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1935, 48 (08): : 696 - 702

[7] COOPER JLR, 1951, P CAMBRIDGE PHIL S 4, V46, P620

[8] Remarks on measurements in quantum theory [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1936, 49 (06): : 0476 - 0476

[9] Note on the quantum-mechanical theory of measurement [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1936, 49 (05): : 0393 - 0399

[10] JAUCH JM, 1935, PHYS REV, V47, P777

[1] ALEXANDROW AD, 1952, P ACAD SCI USSR, V84, P253

[2] FURTHER DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE EXPERIMENTAL TESTS FOR THE PARADOX OF EINSTEIN, PODOLSKY AND ROSEN [J]. NUOVO CIMENTO, 1960, 17 (06): : 964 - 976

[3] DISCUSSION OF EXPERIMENTAL PROOF FOR THE PARADOX OF EINSTEIN, ROSEN, AND PODOLSKY [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1957, 108 (04): : 1070 - 1076

[4] Bohm D., 1951, QUANTUM THEORY

[5] BOHM D, 1962, OBSERVATION INTERPRE, P86

[6] Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1935, 48 (08): : 696 - 702

[7] COOPER JLR, 1951, P CAMBRIDGE PHIL S 4, V46, P620

[8] Remarks on measurements in quantum theory [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1936, 49 (06): : 0476 - 0476

[9] Note on the quantum-mechanical theory of measurement [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1936, 49 (05): : 0393 - 0399

[10] JAUCH JM, 1935, PHYS REV, V47, P777