OREGON DENIAL - DISABILITIES AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE

被引：24

作者：

MENZEL, PT

机构：

[1] Pacific Lutheran University, Tacoma, Washington

来源：

HASTINGS CENTER REPORT | 1992年 / 22卷 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/3562943

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

In using quality of life as a guide to rationing health services, Oregon laid itself open to charges of bias against the disabled-charges that cannot be dismissed out of hand.

引用

页码：21 / 25

页数：5

共 16 条

[1] IS THE OREGON RATIONING PLAN FAIR [J].

DANIELS, N .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (17) :2232-2235

[2]

DOUGHERTY CJ, 1991, HASTINGS CENT REP S, V21, P1

[3]

Fleck Leonard M, 1990, Bus Prof Ethics J, V9, P201

[4]

Garland M J, 1992, Law Med Health Care, V20, P67

[5] THE OREGON PRIORITY-SETTING EXERCISE - QUALITY-OF-LIFE AND PUBLIC-POLICY [J].

HADORN, DC .

HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1991, 21 (03) :S11-S16

[6] THE PROBLEM OF DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH-CARE PRIORITY SETTING [J].

HADORN, DC .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (11) :1454-1459

[7]

HADORN DC, 1992, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V268, P1455

[8] QALYFYING THE VALUE OF LIFE [J].

HARRIS, J .

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1987, 13 (03) :117-123

[9]

KAPLAN RM, 1988, HEALTH SERV RES, V23, P203

[10]

MENZEL, 1990, STRONG MED ETHICAL R, P84

← 1 2 →