Barriers to the Implementation of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Shipping

被引:42
作者
Yuen, Kum Fai [1 ]
Lim, Jun Ming [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Minist Transport, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Corporate Social Responsibility; Sustainability; Barriers; Contingency; Shipping Logistics;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.03.006
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR) involves the voluntary practice of social and environment activities to satisfy firms' stakeholders, with the intention of generating profits. Companies, especially those within the shipping industry, often face challenges when implementing strategic CSR. The paper therefore, seeks to identify, rank, and discuss the barriers to the implementation of strategic CSR in shipping. A list of barriers was first identified from reviewing the literature. Subsequently, a survey was administered to 600 shipping companies in Singapore and the collected data were analysed using structural equation modelling. The results showed that factors relating to lack of resources, lack of strategic vision, lack of measurement system, high regulatory standards, and low willingness to pay for CSR are significant barriers to implementing strategic CSR in shipping. The findings imply that the practice of strategic CSR is contingent on both the firm's macro-environment and micro-environment, albeit to a lesser extent. Understanding these potential barriers can help companies avoid or overcome these barriers and improve their chances of successfully implementing strategic CSR. Copyright (C) 2016 The Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Inc. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Peer review under responsibility of the Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 57
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   A real option application to investment in low-sulphur maritime transport [J].
Acciaro, Michele .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2014, 6 (02) :189-212
[2]  
Alemagi D., 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, V13, P221, DOI 10.1002/csr.106
[3]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NO CONS WILL NOT PAY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, AM J ENG APPL SCI
[6]  
Arat L., 2011, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES
[7]   Corporate social responsibility practices in India: approach, drivers, and barriers [J].
Arevalo, Jorge A. ;
Aravind, Deepa .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2011, 11 (04) :399-+
[8]   Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods [J].
Bagnoli, M ;
Watts, SG .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2003, 12 (03) :419-445
[9]   Does it pay to be really good? addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance [J].
Barnett, Michael L. ;
Salomon, Robert M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (11) :1304-1320
[10]  
Boston Consulting Group, 2012, CHART NEW COURS REST