Althusser's mirror: lawyer distress and the process of interpellation

被引:3
作者
Baron, Paula [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Law, Common Law, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10383441.2015.1028125
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In this paper, I propose that Althusser's theory of interpellation can explain why law students and lawyers so readily accept the proposition that the causes of, and solutions to, lawyer distress lie with the individual. Interpellation, according to Althusser, is the process by which ideologies address the individual. The process of interpellation simultaneously confers upon the individual the status of subject; and ensures the individual voluntarily assumes subjugation. In Althusser's view, interpellation occurs through so-called Ideological State Apparatuses', such as the family, media and, most importantly, education. Specifically, I argue that interpellation instils in law students the notion that the good' citizen-lawyer self-manages their distress through, firstly, recognition and acknowledgement of the problem; and, secondly, the adoption of a variety of techniques aimed at self-management of their distress. The process of interpellation, however, serves to perpetuate the cycle of distress and draws attention away from unhealthy workplace cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 180
页数:24
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
ABA, 1991, NAT C EM CRIS QUAL L
[2]  
ABA Young Lawyers Division, 2000, AM BAR ASS YOUNG LAW
[3]  
Allan Rick, 1997, CREIGHTON LAW R, V31, P265
[4]  
Allen Judy, 2004, ALTERNATIVE LAW J, V29, P286
[5]  
Althusser L, 1971, LENIN PHILOS OTHER E, P121
[6]  
Andrews G., 1999, MENTAL HLTH AUSTR
[7]   What We Should Want with History: A Meditation on Cultural Studies, Methodology, and Politics [J].
Andrews, Sean Johnson .
JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2013, 26 (04) :442-478
[8]  
Australian Law Students Association (ALSA), DEPR AUSTR LAW SCH H
[9]  
Bagust J, 2013, SYD LAW REV, V35, P27
[10]   The Culture of Bullying in Australian Corporate Law Firms [J].
Bagust, Joanne .
LEGAL ETHICS, 2014, 17 (02) :177-201