Decoding the socio-political meanings of Presidential "I" in Mubarak's last presidential speech: A systemic-functional approach

被引:2
作者
Salama, Amir H. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kafr El Sheikh Univ, Fac Arts, Dept English, El Geish St, Kafr Al Sheikh 33516, Egypt
来源
COGENT ARTS & HUMANITIES | 2014年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
Hosni Mubarak & Egypt; 25 January revolution; Presidential "I; systemic-functional approach; pragma-semantic meanings; socio-political meanings; transitivity; mood; theme;
D O I
10.1080/23311983.2014.977554
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper seeks to explain the socio-political meanings of the deictic centre "I" in Mubarak's last presidential speech on 10 February 2011. Crucially, the whole speech thematically revolves around such a deictic centre whose pragma-semantic gravity is well worth a thorough linguistic research, so that the following overarching research question can be addressed: what are the socio-political meanings pertaining to the pronoun "I" in Mubarak's last presidential speech on 10 February 2011? The paper employs a tripartite systemic-functional (SF) model of analysis: transitivity, mood, and theme. Each analytic strand corresponds to one aspect of contextual meaning in the speech: ideational, interpersonal, and textual. There are two important findings, theoretical and practical. First, an SF approach can be text-analytically more explanatory only when the macro socio-political context, underlying the micro co-text, is taken into account. Second, in Mubarak's last presidential speech, there emerges a political discourse that tends to valorize a Presidential "I" in a way that reflects a dominant self-presentation versus a subordinate other-presentation.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Kress G., 1976, PRAGMATICS
  • [32] Kress Gunther, 1976, HALLIDAY SYSTEM FUNC
  • [33] Li Charles N., 1976, SUBJECT TOPIC, P457
  • [34] Lores Sanz Rosa, 2000, REV ALICANTINA ESTUD, V13, P107
  • [35] Lyons J., 1977, SEMANTICS, V2
  • [36] Malinowski B., 1923, MEANING MEANING STUD, P296
  • [37] Railton P, 2003, FACTS VALUES NORMS E
  • [38] Renkema Jan, 2009, TEXTURE DISCOURSE OU
  • [39] Richardson J.E., 2004, MIS REPRESENTING ISL
  • [40] Whose face to be saved? Mubarak's or Egypt's? A pragma-semantic analysis
    Salama, Amir H. Y.
    [J]. PRAGMATICS AND SOCIETY, 2014, 5 (01) : 128 - 146