Parameters of the Judiciary's performance in public policies

被引:1
作者
Martins Alves Junior, Luis Carlos [1 ]
Sampaio, Alexandre Santos [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Univ Brasilia, Direito Constituc, UniCEUB, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[2] Ctr Univ Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
来源
A&C-REVISTA DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO & CONSTITUCIONAL | 2018年 / 18卷 / 74期
关键词
Public policy; Separation of powers; Judiciary; Reserve for contingencies; Judicial decisions;
D O I
10.21056/aec.v19i74.912
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This work has as a reason to verify how the Judiciary Power works in public policies, in light of the doctrine and jurisprudence that deals with the issue. It is pointed out that, as a rule, the definition and implementation of public policies rests with the executive branch, which has a margin of discretion in decision-making, and approves the budget to the legislature. On the other hand, it is pointed out that the classical theory of the separation of powers is not enough, on its own, to exclude the Judiciary Power from public policies, but the performance of this power should not be the rule, but an exception, besides need to observe the reserve of the possible.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 245
页数:29
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
ABRAMOVICH Victor, 2002, DERECHOS SOCIALES CO, P19
[2]  
[Anonymous], POLITICAS PUBLICAS B
[3]  
APPIO Eduardo, 2005, CONTROLE JUDICIAL PO, P137
[4]  
BARROSO Luis Roberto, 2007, REV INTERESSE PUBLIC, P31
[5]  
BERCOVICI Gilberto, 2007, POLITICAS PUBLICAS B, P143
[6]  
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justica, RESP 1 612 931 MS
[7]  
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justica, AGINT RESP 1304269 M
[8]  
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justica, RESP 1 367 549 MG
[9]  
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal, 860 STA
[10]  
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal, 5501 ADI MIN MARC AU