Political Theology and Modernity: Peterson, Blumenberg and Schmitt

被引:1
作者
Navarrete Alonso, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Filosofia, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
来源
DAIMON-REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE FILOSOFIA | 2015年 / 65期
关键词
Peterson; Blumenberg; Schmitt; Modernity; Political Theology; Secularization;
D O I
10.6018/daimon/178431
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to clarify the meaning of Schmitt's expression "political theology" by discussing the homonymous Schmittian doctrine of sovereignty. I will evaluate, on the one hand, the theological (Peterson) and the scientific-philosophical (Blumenberg) critiques of Schmitt and, on the other hand, Schmitt's answer to both critiques, which can be found in Political Theology II. I will try to prove that Schmitt's theory of secularization, as it was proposed in 1922, does not imply a theologization of politics. On the contrary, this theory presupposes the death of God and, therefore, it states that secularity is intrinsic to Modern Age.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 75
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Blumenberg H, 2008, LEGITIMACION EDAD M, P11
[2]  
Blumenberg Hans, 1964, PHILOS FRAGE NACH FO, P240
[3]  
Galindo Hervas A., 2004, ARAUCARIA SEVILLA, P41
[4]  
Galindo Hervas A, 2000, RES PUBL REV FIL POL, P37
[5]  
Galli C., 2010, MIRADA JANO ENSAYOS, P19
[7]  
Marramao G., 1998, CIELO TIERRA GENEALO, P110
[8]  
Monod J. C., 2002, QUERELLE SECULARISAT, P24
[9]  
Peterson E., 1999, MONOTEISMO COMO PROB, P50
[10]  
Peterson Erik, 1951, THEOLOGISCHE TRAKTAT, P9