Yield components, harvest index and plant type in relation to yield differences in field pea genotypes

被引:25
作者
Moot, DJ [1 ]
McNeil, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] LINCOLN UNIV,DEPT PLANT SCI,CANTERBURY,NEW ZEALAND
关键词
conventionally leafed; field peas; Pisum sativum; harvest index; semi-leafless; stability analysis; yield components;
D O I
10.1007/BF00035936
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of yield components, harvest index and morphological characteristics as selection criteria among four field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes was examined. Genotypes were grown at a wide range of plant populations (9 to 400 plants m(-2)) to maximise environmental diversity. Both biological and seed yields approximately doubled from 9 to 100 plants m(-2). This response flattened from 100 to 400 plants m(-2). Differences among the genotypes were found only at 225 and 400 plants m(-2). Analysis of the yield components highlighted the plasticity and large genotype by environment interactions of field peas. The numbers of pods per plant and peas per pod were maximised when each genotype was grown as spaced plants, but the low plant numbers meant seed yields per unit area were at their lowest. Genotypic differences for plant harvest index (PHI) were also only found at 225 and 400 plants m(-2). Broad sense heritability estimates indicated that direct selection for PHI was not feasible. The inference from the yield component and pill results was that alternative selection criteria such as physiological or morphological characteristics may be necessary for improved yield potential. Classification of each genotype indicated that low seedling vigour may be a positive attribute for crop plants of semi-leafless and conventionally leafed field peas. Selection based on any single plant attribute is unlikely to lead to dramatic improvements in the yield potential of field peas. Selection should be based on plant characteristics rather than on differences in yield components.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 40
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Phenotypic and genetic analysis of pod wall ratio, phenology and yield components in field pea
    Sadras, Victor O.
    Lake, Lachlan
    Kaur, Sukhjiwan
    Rosewarne, Garry
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2019, 241
  • [22] Plant maturity and kenaf yield components
    Webber, CL
    Bledsoe, VK
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2002, 16 (02) : 81 - 88
  • [23] Investigation of Forage Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Genotypes for Yield and Yield Components
    Erdurmus, Cengiz
    Erdal, Sekip
    Oten, Mehmet
    Kiremitci, Semiha
    Uzun, Bulent
    MAYDICA, 2021, 66 (02):
  • [24] Harvest index and straw yield of five classes of wheat
    Dai, Jing
    Bean, Brent
    Brown, Bradford
    Bruening, William
    Edwards, Jeff
    Flowers, Michael
    Karow, Russell
    Lee, Chad
    Morgan, Gaylon
    Ottman, Michael
    Ransom, Joel
    Wiersma, Jochum
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 85 : 223 - 227
  • [25] The effect of plant population on dry matter accumulation, yield and yield components of four grain legumes
    Ayaz, S
    McKenzie, BA
    Hill, GD
    AGRONOMY SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND - PROCEEDINGS, TWENTY-NINTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 1999, 1999, 29 : 9 - 15
  • [26] Differences in yield components and kernel Cd accumulation in response to Cd toxicity in four barley genotypes
    Wu, Feibo
    Zhang, Guoping
    Dominy, Peter
    Wu, Hongxia
    Bachir, Dango M. L.
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2007, 70 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [28] Harvest index increase during seed growth of field pea
    Lecoeur, J
    Sinclair, TR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2001, 14 (03) : 173 - 180
  • [29] Influence of drought stress on seed yield, biological yield and harvest index of different cultivars of barley
    Amini, Ali Reza
    Soleymani, Ali
    RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2012, 13 (02) : 472 - 474
  • [30] Heritability of yield and some yield components in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes
    Aycicek, M
    Yildirim, T
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2006, 35 (01): : 17 - 22