Yield components, harvest index and plant type in relation to yield differences in field pea genotypes

被引:25
作者
Moot, DJ [1 ]
McNeil, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] LINCOLN UNIV,DEPT PLANT SCI,CANTERBURY,NEW ZEALAND
关键词
conventionally leafed; field peas; Pisum sativum; harvest index; semi-leafless; stability analysis; yield components;
D O I
10.1007/BF00035936
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of yield components, harvest index and morphological characteristics as selection criteria among four field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes was examined. Genotypes were grown at a wide range of plant populations (9 to 400 plants m(-2)) to maximise environmental diversity. Both biological and seed yields approximately doubled from 9 to 100 plants m(-2). This response flattened from 100 to 400 plants m(-2). Differences among the genotypes were found only at 225 and 400 plants m(-2). Analysis of the yield components highlighted the plasticity and large genotype by environment interactions of field peas. The numbers of pods per plant and peas per pod were maximised when each genotype was grown as spaced plants, but the low plant numbers meant seed yields per unit area were at their lowest. Genotypic differences for plant harvest index (PHI) were also only found at 225 and 400 plants m(-2). Broad sense heritability estimates indicated that direct selection for PHI was not feasible. The inference from the yield component and pill results was that alternative selection criteria such as physiological or morphological characteristics may be necessary for improved yield potential. Classification of each genotype indicated that low seedling vigour may be a positive attribute for crop plants of semi-leafless and conventionally leafed field peas. Selection based on any single plant attribute is unlikely to lead to dramatic improvements in the yield potential of field peas. Selection should be based on plant characteristics rather than on differences in yield components.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 40
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Variability and correlations of yield components, harvest index and yield of chamomile flower heads
    Drazic, S
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 2000, 46 (02): : 93 - 96
  • [2] Harvest index and the components of biological yield in sugarcane
    Kapur, Raman
    Duttamajumder, S. K.
    Srivastava, B. L.
    Madhok, H. L.
    Kumar, Ram
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 2013, 73 (04) : 386 - 391
  • [3] YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FIELD PEA ON TWO DIFFERENT SOIL TYPES
    Rapcan, Irena
    Grljusic, Sonja
    Jurisic, Mladen
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 36 : 1271 - 1274
  • [4] Estimates of relative contribution of biomass, harvest index and yield components to soybean yield improvements in China
    Cui, SY
    Yu, DY
    PLANT BREEDING, 2005, 124 (05) : 473 - 476
  • [5] EFFECTS OF SHADING ON THE YIELD COMPONENTS OF 6 LEAFLESS PEA GENOTYPES
    HEDLEY, CL
    AMBROSE, MJ
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1979, 44 (04) : 469 - 478
  • [6] Biomass and seed yield stability of pea genotypes
    Tamkoc, Ahmet
    Ustun, Ali
    Altinok, Suzan
    Acikgoz, Esvet
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (01): : 140 - 146
  • [7] THE IMPACT OF PLANT DENSITY ON THE SEED YIELD AND THE SPRING FIELD PEA'S YIELD COMPONENT
    Krizmanic, G.
    Tucak, M.
    Brkic, A.
    Markovic, M.
    Jovanovic, V. S.
    Berakovic, I
    Cupic, T.
    POLJOPRIVREDA, 2020, 26 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [8] Effects of different water regimes on field-grown determinate and indeterminate faba bean (Vicia faba L) .2. Yield, yield components and harvest index
    DeCosta, WAJM
    Dennett, MD
    Ratnaweera, U
    Nyalemegbe, K
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1997, 52 (1-2) : 169 - 178
  • [9] Yield, Yield Components, Soil Chemical Properties, Plant Physiology, and Phosphorus Use Efficiency in Soybean Genotypes
    Moreira, A.
    Moraes, L. A. C.
    Moretti, L. G.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2017, 48 (20) : 2464 - 2476
  • [10] Sowing ratio and N fertilization affect yield and yield components of oat and pea in intercrops
    Neugschwandtner, Reinhard W.
    Kaul, Hans-Peter
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 155 : 159 - 163