FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOTIC TECHNIQUES

被引:52
作者
GEMLO, BT [1 ]
BELMONTE, C [1 ]
WILTZ, O [1 ]
MADOFF, RD [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA, DEPT SURG, DIV COLON & RECTAL SURG, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80122-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in deal pouch-anal anastomotic (IPAA) technique include the substitution of a double stapled anastomosis for a mucosectomy and hand-sewn pouch-anal anastomosis, and the use of staples to construct a ''J'' shaped pouch rather than a hand-sewn ''S'' pouch in most cases. METHOD: To determine the impact these technical changes have had on pouch function, 235 IPAA patients with 15 to 155 months of follow-up (mean 70 months) were interviewed by telephone concerning pouch function and quality of life. Categorical responses were then evaluated by contingency table analysis to detect differences between mucosectomy (n = 157) and nonmucosectomy (n = 80) groups, and between J pouch (n = 50), S pouch with mucosectomy (n = 137), and S pouch nonmucosectomy (n = 30) subgroups. An index encompassing nine functional measures tvas used to quantify the overall impact of technique changes (optimal score 100). RESULTS: Stool frequency for mucosectomy patients was 7.2 movements/24 hours, compared to 7.1 for nonmucosectomy patients. Elimination of a mucosectomy dramatically reduced nocturnal major incontinence (P < 0.001), nocturnal minor incontinence (P < 0.001), day-time minor incontinence (P = 0.03), and day-time pad use (P = 0.002), Nonmucosectomy patients had a better functional index score than had patients with an S pouch, even when only data from nonmucosectomy patients were analyzed (J = 95.5, S = 91.8, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance of a mucosectomy in the performance of an deal pouch-anal anastomosis does not influence stool frequency but does significantly improve fecal continence and introduces no detectable morbidity associated with the retained rectal mucosa.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] MCINTYRE PB, 1994, DIS COLON RECTUM, V37, P303
  • [12] COMPARISON OF THE FUNCTION OF TRIPLICATED AND DUPLICATED PELVIC ILEAL RESERVOIRS AFTER MUCOSAL PROCTECTOMY AND ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS FOR ULCERATIVE-COLITIS AND ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS
    NASMYTH, DG
    WILLIAMS, NS
    JOHNSTON, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (05) : 361 - 366
  • [13] PROCTOCOLECTOMY WITH ILEAL RESERVOIR AND ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    PARKS, AG
    NICHOLLS, RJ
    BELLIVEAU, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1980, 67 (08) : 533 - 538
  • [14] CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY
    PESCATORI, M
    MATTANA, C
    CASTAGNETO, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 75 (04) : 321 - 324
  • [15] FACTORS AFFECTING ANAL CONTINENCE AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY
    PESCATORI, M
    MATTANA, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1990, 5 (04) : 213 - 218
  • [16] CARCINOMA OF THE RECTAL POUCH FOLLOWING RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY - REPORT OF A CASE
    PUTHU, D
    RAJAN, N
    RAO, R
    RAO, L
    VENUGOPAL, P
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1992, 35 (03) : 257 - 260
  • [17] RETAINED MUCOSA AFTER DOUBLE-STAPLED ILEAL RESERVOIR AND ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    SCHMITT, SL
    WEXNER, SD
    LUCAS, FV
    JAMES, K
    NOGUERAS, JJ
    JAGELMAN, DG
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1992, 35 (11) : 1051 - 1056
  • [18] CANCER IN AN ILEOANAL RESERVOIR - A NEW LATE COMPLICATION
    STERN, H
    WALFISCH, S
    MULLEN, B
    MCLEOD, R
    COHEN, Z
    [J]. GUT, 1990, 31 (04) : 473 - 475
  • [19] Utsunomiya J, 1989, Z Gastroenterol Verh, V24, P249
  • [20] THE ILEOANAL RESERVOIR
    WEXNER, SD
    WONG, WD
    ROTHENBERGER, DA
    GOLDBERG, SM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 159 (01) : 178 - 185