Use and Avoidance of Seclusion and Restraint: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA Seclusion and Restraint Workgroup

被引:121
作者
Knox, Daryl K. [1 ]
Holloman, Garland H., Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mental Hlth & Mental Retardat Author Harris Cty, Comprehens Psychiat Emergency Program, 1502 Taub Loop, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
关键词
Agitation; Psychiatric emergency; Restraint; Seclusion;
D O I
10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6867
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Issues surrounding reduction and/or elimination of episodes of seclusion and restraint for patients with behavioral problems in crisis clinics, emergency departments, inpatient psychiatric units, and specialized psychiatric emergency services continue to be an area of concern and debate among mental health clinicians. An important underlying principle of Project BETA (Best practices in Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation) is noncoercive de-escalation as the intervention of choice in the management of acute agitation and threatening behavior. In this article, the authors discuss several aspects of seclusion and restraint, including review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines regulating their use in medical behavioral settings, negative consequences of this intervention to patients and staff, and a review of quality improvement and risk management strategies that have been effective in decreasing their use in various treatment settings. An algorithm designed to help the clinician determine when seclusion or restraint is most appropriate is introduced. The authors conclude that the specialized psychiatric emergency services and emergency departments, because of their treatment primarily of acute patients, may not be able to entirely eliminate the use of seclusion and restraint events, but these programs can adopt strategies to reduce the utilization rate of these interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 40
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Eliminating seclusion and restraint in recovery-oriented crisis services
    Ashcraft, Lori
    Anthony, William
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2008, 59 (10) : 1198 - 1202
  • [2] Berlin J., PSYCHIAT NEWS
  • [3] Borckardt JJ, 2011, PSYCHIAT SERV, V62, P477, DOI 10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0477
  • [4] Special section on seclusion and restraint: Introduction to the special section
    Busch, AB
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2005, 56 (09) : 1104 - 1104
  • [5] Relationship of restraint use, patient injury, and assaults on EMS personnel
    Cheney, Paul R.
    Gossett, Linda
    Fullerton-Gleason, Lynne
    Weiss, Steven J.
    Ernst, Amy A.
    Sklar, David
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2006, 10 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [6] Department of Health and Human Services, 2006, FED REGISTER, V482, P71426
  • [7] An analysis of successful efforts to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint at a public psychiatric hospital
    Donat, DC
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2003, 54 (08) : 1119 - 1123
  • [8] Frequency of alternative to restraints and seclusion and uses of agitation reduction techniques in the emergency department
    Downey, La Vonne A.
    Zun, Leslie S.
    Gonzales, Sandra Jones
    [J]. GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 29 (06) : 470 - 474
  • [9] DUHART DT, 2001, PUBLICATION NCJ
  • [10] FISHER WA, 1994, AM J PSYCHIAT, V151, P1584