Gaining Balance: Toward a Grounded Theory of the Decision-Making Processes of Applicants for Adoption of Children with and without Disabilities

被引:0
作者
Burge, Philip [1 ]
Jamieson, Margaret [2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Psychiat, ORC,191 Portsmouth Ave, Kingston, ON K7M 8A6, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Sch Rehabil Therapy, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
Child Adoption; Decision Making; Child Welfare; Children; Motivation; Grounded Theory; Qualitative Research; Disability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
A grounded theory is presented of the decision-making processes among applicants when considering available children with and without disabilities for domestic public adoption. Using grounded theory methodology (Strauss & Corbin, 1998), data from 15 adoption applicants were analyzed followed the traditional three coding phases. The central category of Adoption Decision Making is labeled Gaining Balance and was the underpinning concept to all categories and sub-categories (i.e., in parentheses) of the theory: Commitment (e.g., motivation, financial considerations), Persistence (e.g., coping with emotions, counteracting pessimism), and Evaluation (e.g., assessments of personal abilities and resources, assessments of knowledge of potential adoptees' needs). The results are compared to existing literature and implications for child welfare practices and further research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 603
页数:38
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Betsch T, 2005, ROUTINES OF DECISION MAKING, pIX
[2]   An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems [J].
Bryson, N ;
Mobolurin, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 96 (02) :379-386
[3]  
Burge P., 2008, UNDERSTANDING APPLIC
[4]   Prevalence of mental disorders and associated service variables among Ontario children who are permanent wards [J].
Burge, Philip .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2007, 52 (05) :305-314
[5]  
Burge Philip, 2007, CANADIAN SOCIAL WORK, V9, P8
[6]   Dynamic and consequential consistency of choices between paths of decision trees [J].
Busemeyer, JR ;
Weg, E ;
Barkan, R ;
Li, XY ;
Ma, ZP .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2000, 129 (04) :530-545
[7]  
Casler M., 1995, THESIS
[8]  
Coyne A., 1997, ADOPTION POLICY SPEC, P61
[9]  
Creswell J.W., 1998, QUAL INQ
[10]   INFERTILITY RESOLUTION AND ADOPTION READINESS [J].
DALY, K .
FAMILIES IN SOCIETY-THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HUMAN SERVICES, 1990, 71 (08) :483-492