IN DEFENSE OF ACTION RESEARCH ADOPTION IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, IN BRAZIL

被引:0
作者
Freitas, Jonathan [1 ]
Calbino, Daniel [1 ]
Santos, Alexandre [1 ]
Pereira, Rafael Diogo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Adm, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
ADMINISTRACAO-ENSINO E PESQUISA | 2010年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
Action Research; strategy; management;
D O I
10.13058/raep.2010.v11n3.137
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
An analysis of the work published at national Management events shows that action research in Brazil has been used in a considerably restricted manner. It seems the reason for this is the difficulty faced by researchers in justifying the academic merits of this methodological strategy versus the traditional scientific approach. Thus, a proper understanding of the nature of action research and its supportive assumptions could help to sustain the argument in favor of its adoption. Accordingly, the objective of the work is to revisit the main characteristics of action research, highlighting the distinctive features that grant it a unique identity: one that is legitimate and relevant in the context of scientific research. It is concluded that action research is normally adopted when the issue researched is shown to be complex and less studied, thus requiring significant interaction between the researchers and research object, being based on questions that are of main importance to the actual subjects involved. It can, therefore, be considered an approach that is of definite relevance to organizational science in general and management ones in particular.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 445
页数:21
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PESQUISA ACAO NAS OR
[2]  
Argyris C., 1974, THEORIES IN PRACTICE
[3]   Action research - A paradigm for achieving social change [J].
Bargal, David .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2008, 39 (01) :17-27
[4]  
Burrell G., 1979, SOCIOLOGICAL PARADIG
[5]   Validating Action Research field studies: PEArL [J].
Champion, D ;
Stowell, FA .
SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2003, 16 (01) :21-36
[6]   Action research: Its nature and validity [J].
Checkland, P ;
Holwell, S .
SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 1998, 11 (01) :9-21
[7]   Interlevel dynamics in systemic action research [J].
Coghlan, D .
SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2002, 15 (04) :273-283
[8]  
COGHLAN D, 2004, IRISH J MANAGEMENT, V25, P1
[9]   Action research for operations management [J].
Coughlan, P ;
Coghlan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2002, 22 (02) :220-240
[10]  
DALMORO M., 2007, ENCONTRO NACL PROGRA