Evaluation of host biomarkers for monitoring treatment response in spinal tuberculosis: A 12-month cohort study

Background: Monitoring treatment response is an important precaution in spinal tuberculosis (TB), particularly when the condition was clinically diagnosed rather than bacteriologically confirmed and when drug susceptibility testing was not performed. Conventional monitoring measures have limitations and there is a need for favourable alternatives. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate changes in immune biomarkers over the course of treatment for spinal TB and to compare these responses to the conventional monitoring measure, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Methods: Patients with spinal TB were recruited from a tertiary hospital in the Western Cape, South Africa, and provided blood samples at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of TB treatment. Blood samples were analysed for ESR, using standard techniques, and for 19 cytokines, using a multiplex platform. Changes in ESR and cytokine levels were investigated using a mixed model ANOVA and Least Significant Difference post-hoc testing. Results: Twenty-six patients with spinal TB were included in the study although only fifteen remained in follow-up at 12 months. Seven biomarkers changed significantly over the course of treatment (CRP, Fibrinogen, IFN-gamma, Ferritin, VEGF-A, ApoA1 and NCAM, p < 0.01) with a further three showing a strong trend towards change (CCL1, CXCL9 and GDF-15, 0.05 & GE; p & LE; 0.06). Responsive biomarkers could be approximately grouped according to patterns of progressive, initial or delayed change. ESR performed similarly to CRP, Fibrinogen and IFN-gamma with all showing significant decreases between 0, 6 and 12- months of treatment. Individual ESR responses were variable. Discussion: Individual ESR responses may be unreliable and support the investigation of multi-marker approaches to evaluating treatment response in spinal TB. Biomarkers of treatment response identified in the current study require validation in a larger study, which may also incorporate aspects such as evaluating biomarkers within the first week of treatment and the inclusion of a healthy control group.