TRAINING FOR RURAL GENERAL-PRACTICE

Objective: To identify requirements for vocational training and continuing education programs in rural general practice. Design: A questionnaire was sent to all 487 rural doctors and 140 metropolitan and 140 provincial city general practitioners (GPs) in Queensland. A sample of medical educators, health professional and consumer representatives and rural doctors was also interviewed. Responses were compared by geographical area, practice characteristics and level of postgraduate training. Results: There are significant differences between rural and urban practice profiles. Rural doctors have to practise a range of clinical skills in an environment with restricted access to health professional support, although the need for advanced training in procedural or other skills depends on the type of rural practise. Rural and urban doctors want more influence in determining continuing medical education (CME) programs. Interactive learning methods were rated as the most effective education methods by both rural and urban GPs. Rural doctors were less likely to consider that they spent enough time on CME. Conclusion: Vocational training programs should accommodate various rural career objectives, including those requiring advanced levels of procedural work. There is a significant unmet demand for CME tailored to the needs of individual doctors, both rural and urban, but distance and isolation may make this more critical in rural practice. These issues need to be addressed as training opportunities can contribute to improved retention of the rural medical workforce.