Theorizing power in political ecology: the where of power in resource governance projects

被引:107
作者
Ahlborg, Helene [1 ,2 ]
Nightingale, Andrea J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sch Global Studies, Box 700, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Div Environm Syst Anal, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Urban & Rural Dev, Umea, Sweden
[4] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, As, Norway
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Power; political ecology; sociotechnical systems; renewable energy; Tanzania;
D O I
10.2458/v25i1.22804
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Power and politics have been central topics from the early days of Political Ecology. There are different and sometimes conflicting conceptualizations of power in this field that portray power alternatively as a resource, personal attribute or relation. The aim of this article is to contribute to theorizations of power by probing contesting views regarding its role in societal change and by presenting a specific conceptualization of power, one which draws on political ecology and sociotechnical approaches in science and technology studies. We review how power has been conceptualized in the political ecology field and identify three trends that shaped current discussions. We then develop our conceptual discussion and ask explicitly where power emerges in processes of resource governance projects. We identify four locations that we illustrate empirically through an example of rural electrification in Tanzania that aimed at catalyzing social and economic development by providing renewable energy-based electricity services. Our analysis supports the argument that power is relational and productive, and it draws on science and technology studies to bring to the fore the critical role of non-human elements in co-constitution of society - technology - nature. This leads us to see the exercise of power as having contradictory and ambiguous effects. We conclude that by exploring the tension between human agency and constitutive power, we keep the politics alive throughout the analysis and are able to show why intentional choices and actions really matter for how resource governance projects play out in everyday life.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 401
页数:21
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   THE GENDER AND ENVIRONMENT DEBATE - LESSONS FROM INDIA [J].
AGARWAL, B .
FEMINIST STUDIES, 1992, 18 (01) :119-158
[2]  
Agrawal A., 2005, ENV TECHNOLOGIES GOV
[3]  
Ahlborg H., 2015, THESIS
[4]   Towards a conceptualization of power in energy transitions [J].
Ahlborg, Helene .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2017, 25 :122-141
[5]   Small-scale hydropower in Africa: Socio-technical designs for renewable energy in Tanzanian villages [J].
Ahlborg, Helene ;
Sjostedt, Martin .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 5 :20-33
[6]   Power, subjectivity, and agency: Between Arendt and Foucault [J].
Allen, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2002, 10 (02) :131-149
[7]  
Allen A, 2021, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS
[8]  
Allen A., 1998, CONSTELLATIONS, V5, P456, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8675.00108
[9]  
Allen A., 2008, HYPATIA, V23
[10]  
[Anonymous], SHAPING TECHNOLOGY B