Development and validation of the algebra teachers' self-efficacy instrument: Assessment of algebra teachers' knowledge and personal teaching efficacy

被引:1
作者
Wilkerson, Trena L. [1 ]
Eddy, Colleen M. [2 ]
Fuentes, Sarah Quebec [3 ]
Sorto, M. Alejandra [4 ]
Gupta, Dittika [5 ]
Ward, Elizabeth K. [6 ]
Jasper, William A. [7 ]
Parker, Yolanda A. [8 ]
Mallam, Winifred [9 ]
Cooper, Sandra [1 ]
Kerschen, Keith [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Waco, TX 76798 USA
[2] Univ North Texas, Dept Teacher Educ & Adm, Denton, TX USA
[3] Texas Christian Univ, Andrews Inst Math & Sci Educ, Ft Worth, TX 76129 USA
[4] Texas State Univ, Dept Math, San Marcos, TX USA
[5] Midwestern State Univ, Dept Curriculum & Learning, Wichita Falls, TX 76308 USA
[6] Texas Wesleyan Univ, Sch Educ, Ft Worth, TX USA
[7] Sam Houston State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Huntsville, TX 77340 USA
[8] Tarrant Cty Coll, Dept Math, Ft Worth, TX USA
[9] Texas Womans Univ, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Denton, TX 76204 USA
关键词
algebra; professional development; teacher assessment;
D O I
10.1111/ssm.12291
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
There is a compelling need to develop an algebra teacher self-efficacy instrument (ATSEI) as algebra continues to be considered a gatekeeper course for postsecondary educational and career opportunities, which is seen as a crucial piece in closing the achievement gap. This paper reports on the development and validation of the ATSEI, an instrument that measures two domains, Efficacy To Do School Algebra (Knowledge Efficacy, KE-A) and Efficacy to Teach Algebra (Personal Teaching Efficacy, PTE-A) along six categories. Four of the categories represented content standards (variables, functions, patterns, and modeling) and two of the categories represented process standards (technology and concrete models, and multiple representations). Through conducting an exploratory factor analysis across two phases, the instrument was reduced and refined from an initial 118 items developed from a curriculum analysis to 36 items that reflected two significant categories, Functions and Technology. The ATSEI measure is validated for in-service mathematics teachers and thus provides an instrument to examine need and impact in professional development venues. The specificity of the ATSEI allows those working with teachers to be better able to support them in the field and in return positively influence the learning outcomes of the students they teach.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 217
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] AERA APA & NCME, 2014, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
  • [2] Alreck P.L., 1985, SURVEY RES HDB
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, J SCI TEACH EDUC, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1016708016311
  • [4] Armor D., 1976, ANAL SCH PREFERRED R
  • [5] Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87
    Artino, Anthony R., Jr.
    La Rochelle, Jeffrey S.
    Dezee, Kent J.
    Gehlbach, Hunter
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2014, 36 (06) : 463 - 474
  • [6] Bailey, 2009, NEW DIRECTIONS COMMU, V145, P11, DOI [10.1002/cc.352, DOI 10.1002/CC.352]
  • [7] SELF SYSTEM IN RECIPROCAL DETERMINISM
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1978, 33 (04) : 344 - 358
  • [8] SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) : 191 - 215
  • [9] ECUMENISM IN RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1979, 3 (03) : 245 - 248
  • [10] Bandura A., 2006, SELF EFFICACY BELIEF, P307, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004