PREDICTION OF THE SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT - WHICH ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT IS BEST

被引:0
|
作者
CHANG, TC
ROBSON, SC
BOYS, RJ
SPENCER, JAD
机构
[1] UNIV COLL HOSP LONDON,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,86-96 CHENIES MEWS,LONDON WC1E 6HX,ENGLAND
[2] UNIV NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE,DEPT MATH & STAT,NEWCASTLE TYNE NE1 7RU,TYNE & WEAR,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the most appropriate ultrasonic measurement for the prediction of a small for gestational age (SGA) infant. Data sources: A literature search of all English language journals over the last 15 years was undertaken. One hundred seventeen articles on the use of morphometric and Doppler ultrasonic measurements in the diagnosis of SGA were reviewed. Methods of study selection: Studies were included if antenatal and postnatal criteria for diagnosis were clearly defined and data for SGA and normal fetuses were reported, allowing the construction of a 2 x 2 table. Data extraction and synthesis: Studies with the same criteria were grouped according to whether the population was high or low risk. The sensitivity, odds ratio (OR), and false-positive rate were calculated for each study; summary statistics were then calculated for each ultrasonic measurement provided the individual sensitivities, ORs, and false-positive rates were not significantly different (P > .01). Conclusions: In high-risk subjects, abdominal circumference below the tenth percentile had the highest common sensitivity, and estimated fetal weight below the tenth percentile had the highest common OR. In studies in which morphometric and Doppler ultrasonic measurements were compared in the same subjects, the Doppler ORs tended to be lower than the ORs for morphometric measurements. In low-risk subjects, much lower ORs were found for all ultrasonic measurements The heterogeneous nature of the studies reviewed may have contributed to the different results within each group.
引用
收藏
页码:1030 / 1038
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The burden of small-for-gestational-age births is very
    不详
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2013, 40 (03): : 210 - 210
  • [42] INTRAPARTAL CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY IN PREDICTION OF WELL-BEING OF SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE NEWBORNS
    PALO, P
    ERKKOLA, R
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1991, 31 (02) : 86 - 89
  • [43] Prediction and prevention of small-for-gestational-age neonates: evidence from SPREE and ASPRE
    Tan, M. Y.
    Poon, L. C.
    Rolnik, D. L.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Matallana, C. De Paco
    Akolekar, R.
    Cicero, S.
    Janga, D.
    Singh, M.
    Molina, F. S.
    Persico, N.
    Jani, J. C.
    Plasencia, W.
    Greco, E.
    Papaioannou, G.
    Wright, D.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 52 (01) : 52 - 59
  • [44] THE SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT - ACCELERATED OR DELAYED PULMONARY MATURATION - INCREASED OR DECREASED SURVIVAL
    TYSON, JE
    KENNEDY, K
    BROYLES, S
    ROSENFELD, CR
    PEDIATRICS, 1995, 95 (04) : 534 - 538
  • [45] PROTEIN-C K-DEPENDENT IN PRETERM AND IN SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT
    SCHETTINI, F
    DEMATTIA, D
    ALTOMARE, M
    MAUTONE, A
    LOSCIALE, L
    ARCAMONE, GP
    CIAVARELLA, G
    RIVISTA ITALIANA DI PEDIATRIA-ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1986, 12 (03): : 262 - 264
  • [46] ANTENATAL SCREENING OF SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS BY SYMPHYSIAL FUNDAL HEIGHT MEASUREMENT
    LINASMITA, V
    JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND, 1985, 68 (11): : 587 - 591
  • [47] METABOLIC ADAPTATION IN SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS
    HAWDON, JM
    PLATT, MPW
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 1993, 68 (03): : 262 - 268
  • [48] Diagnostic test characteristics of placental weight in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Ness, Roberta B.
    Bass, Debra
    Hill, Lyndon
    Klebanoff, Mark A.
    Zhang, Jun
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 52 (09) : 793 - 800
  • [49] ABC OF ANTENATAL CARE - SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE
    CHAMBERLAIN, G
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 302 (6792) : 1592 - 1596
  • [50] The small-for-gestational-age twin - Blessing or curse?
    Usta, IM
    Harb, TS
    Rechdan, JB
    Suidan, FG
    Nassar, AH
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 50 (07) : 491 - 495