PREDICTION OF THE SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT - WHICH ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT IS BEST

被引:0
|
作者
CHANG, TC
ROBSON, SC
BOYS, RJ
SPENCER, JAD
机构
[1] UNIV COLL HOSP LONDON,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,86-96 CHENIES MEWS,LONDON WC1E 6HX,ENGLAND
[2] UNIV NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE,DEPT MATH & STAT,NEWCASTLE TYNE NE1 7RU,TYNE & WEAR,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the most appropriate ultrasonic measurement for the prediction of a small for gestational age (SGA) infant. Data sources: A literature search of all English language journals over the last 15 years was undertaken. One hundred seventeen articles on the use of morphometric and Doppler ultrasonic measurements in the diagnosis of SGA were reviewed. Methods of study selection: Studies were included if antenatal and postnatal criteria for diagnosis were clearly defined and data for SGA and normal fetuses were reported, allowing the construction of a 2 x 2 table. Data extraction and synthesis: Studies with the same criteria were grouped according to whether the population was high or low risk. The sensitivity, odds ratio (OR), and false-positive rate were calculated for each study; summary statistics were then calculated for each ultrasonic measurement provided the individual sensitivities, ORs, and false-positive rates were not significantly different (P > .01). Conclusions: In high-risk subjects, abdominal circumference below the tenth percentile had the highest common sensitivity, and estimated fetal weight below the tenth percentile had the highest common OR. In studies in which morphometric and Doppler ultrasonic measurements were compared in the same subjects, the Doppler ORs tended to be lower than the ORs for morphometric measurements. In low-risk subjects, much lower ORs were found for all ultrasonic measurements The heterogeneous nature of the studies reviewed may have contributed to the different results within each group.
引用
收藏
页码:1030 / 1038
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PLACENTAL PROTEIN-12 (PP12) - A NEW TEST FOR THE PREDICTION OF THE SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT
    HOWELL, RJS
    PERRY, LA
    CHOGLAY, NS
    BOHN, H
    CHARD, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1985, 92 (11): : 1141 - 1144
  • [22] Screening for small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    Hansen, Ditte N.
    Odgaard, Helle S.
    Uldbjerg, Niels
    Sinding, Marianne
    Sorensen, Anne
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (04) : 503 - 509
  • [23] PASSIVE SMOKING DURING PREGNANCY AND THE RISK OF DELIVERING A SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT
    FORTIER, I
    MARCOUX, S
    BRISSON, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 139 (03) : 294 - 301
  • [24] SURVEILLANCE FOR SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE FETUSES
    HALL, MH
    LANCET, 1992, 340 (8830) : 1294 - 1294
  • [25] THROMBOCYTOPENIA IN SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS
    SHUPER, A
    MIMOUNI, F
    MERLOB, P
    ZAIZOV, R
    REISNER, SH
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1983, 72 (01): : 139 - 140
  • [26] CORDOCENTESIS AND FETUSES THAT ARE SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE
    SOOTHILL, PW
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (10) : 728 - 729
  • [27] Hypoglycemia in small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Karahasanoglu, O
    Karatekin, G
    Kose, R
    Nuhoglu, A
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1997, 39 (02) : 159 - 164
  • [28] FETAL LIVER LENGTH MEASUREMENT DOES NOT PROVIDE A SUPERIOR MEANS FOR PREDICTION OF A SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE FETUS
    SENOH, D
    HATA, T
    KITAO, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1994, 11 (05) : 344 - 347
  • [29] Ponderal Index of the Newborn: Effect of Smoking on the Index of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Infant
    Okah, Felix A.
    Hoff, Gerald L.
    Dew, Paul C.
    Cai, Jinwen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2010, 27 (05) : 353 - 360
  • [30] THROMBOCYTOPENIA IN SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS
    SHUPER, A
    MIMOUNI, F
    MERLOB, P
    ZAIZOV, R
    REISNER, SH
    TIKVA, P
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1981, 17 (11): : 1095 - 1095