Board diversity, audit committee characteristics and audit quality: The moderating role of control-ownership wedge

被引:16
作者
Mustafa, Aree Saeed [1 ,2 ]
Che-Ahmad, Ayoib [3 ]
Chandren, Sitraselvi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duhok, Dept Tourism & Hotels, Duhok, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[2] Nawroz Univ, Dept Business Adm, Duhok, Iraq
[3] Univ Utara Malaysia, Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz Sch Accountancy, Changlun, Kedah, Malaysia
关键词
Audit quality; board diversity; audit committee; control-ownership wedge; Turkey;
D O I
10.15208/beh.2018.42
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study illustrates how control-ownership wedge impacts the monitoring role of the corporate board through the quality of audit services in Turkey. Turkey has made essential amendments in the field of external audit in order to enhance the quality of the financial report and integrate its own capital market with that of the EU. It would be of interest to examine the influence of these changes on clients' demand for high quality audit. The agency theory is integrated with the resource dependence theory to show that boards possess distinct incentives and ability to demand high quality audit to monitor management activities. Logistic regression and feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) were used for regression estimations. The results indicate that board demographics, cognitive and structural diversity of board of directors, audit committee characteristics and audit quality are complementary and control-ownership wedge weakens the relationship between them which is an unfavorable outcome for minority shareholders. Thus, this study proposes that regulators should increase law enforcement to enhance good corporate governance in Turkey to accommodate the unique features of wedge firms and provide a protected environment for minority shareholders.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 614
页数:28
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Abbott L. J., 2002, RES ACCOUNTING REGUL, V15, P151
[2]   Audit committee characteristics and restatements [J].
Abbott, LJ ;
Parker, S ;
Peters, GF .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2004, 23 (01) :69-87
[3]   Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics [J].
Abbott, LJ ;
Parker, S .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2000, 19 (02) :47-66
[4]  
Adams R., 2008, J ECON LIT, V48, P58
[5]   Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance [J].
Adams, Renee B. ;
Ferreira, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 94 (02) :291-309
[6]   Corporate governance and accounting scandals [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Chadha, S .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2005, 48 (02) :371-406
[7]   An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Filatotchev, Igor ;
Gospel, Howard ;
Jackson, Gregory .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (03) :475-492
[8]   AUDITING, DIRECTORSHIPS AND THE DEMAND FOR MONITORING [J].
ANDERSON, D ;
FRANCIS, JR ;
STOKES, DJ .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 1993, 12 (04) :353-375
[9]   Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Mansi, SA ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2004, 37 (03) :315-342
[10]  
Ararat M., 2014, 1319 ECGI NW LAW EC, DOI [10.2139/SSRN.2277768, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2277768]