Robotic surgery for gastric tumor: current status and new approaches

被引:10
作者
Lim, Seung Hyun [1 ]
Lee, Hae Min [1 ]
Son, Taeil [1 ]
Hyung, Woo Jin [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Hyoung-Il [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Yonsei Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ Hlth Syst, Robot & Minimally Invas Surg Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ Hlth Syst, Severance Hosp, Open NBI Convergence Technol Res Lab, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Robotic surgery; gastrectomy; fluorescence imaging; learning curve; feasibility;
D O I
10.21037/tgh.2016.03.21
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Surgical techniques have evolved tremendously over this past century. To maximize the efficacy and minimize the invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery, researchers have sought to implement wider application of robotics. Nevertheless, both optimism without sound evidence and fear of new technology obscure the appropriate uses of robotic surgery. In the present review, we attempted to provide a balanced perspective on the current state of robotic gastrectomy, outlining evidence and opportunities for the use thereof. Although evidence is limited, the use of robotics is feasible for gastric cancer surgery, and less than 10 cases of robotic surgery are needed to become proficient therein. Compared to the clinical impact of laparoscopy on gastric cancer surgery, the additional benefits of robotic surgery to patients seem to be limited. Despite additional costs and longer surgeries, robotic surgery reportedly does not offer surgical outcomes superior to those for laparoscopic surgery, according to a recent multicenter study. Meanwhile, however, our in-depth review of retrospective and prospective reports revealed that robots could expand the indications of minimally invasive gastrectomy for patients requiring total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Moreover, we found that robotic gastrectomy is associated with a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes, less bleeding, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay, compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Accordingly, new surgical approaches using advanced technologies, such as near infrared detectors, the Tilepro (R) multi-input display, dual consoles, and the Single-Site (R) system, are under investigation. In conclusion, measuring the additional benefits of robotic over laparoscopic surgery would be difficult and clinically insignificant. Thus, developing new surgical procedures that extend the benefits of conventional laparoscopic surgery to patients in whom minimally invasive surgery would not be possible is necessary to justify the greater use of robotic surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Pilot series of robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer [J].
Anderson, Casandra ;
Ellenhorn, Joshua ;
Hellan, Minia ;
Pigazzi, Alessio .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (09) :1662-1666
[2]   Open vs robot-assisted laparoscopic gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study [J].
Caruso, Stefano ;
Patriti, Alberto ;
Marrelli, Daniele ;
Ceccarelli, Graziano ;
Ceribelli, Cecilia ;
Roviello, Franco ;
Casciola, Luciano .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2011, 7 (04) :452-458
[3]  
Crusco S, 2014, JSLS, V18
[4]   Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer [J].
Eom, B. W. ;
Yoon, H. M. ;
Ryu, K. W. ;
Lee, J. H. ;
Cho, S. J. ;
Lee, J. Y. ;
Kim, C. G. ;
Choi, I. J. ;
Lee, J. S. ;
Kook, M. C. ;
Rhee, J. Y. ;
Park, S. R. ;
Kim, Y. W. .
EJSO, 2012, 38 (01) :57-63
[5]   Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopy-Assisted Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis [J].
Han, Dong-Seok ;
Suh, Yun-Suhk ;
Ahn, Hye Seong ;
Kong, Seong-Ho ;
Lee, Hyuk-Joon ;
Kim, Woo-Ho ;
Yang, Han-Kwang .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (07) :2323-2328
[6]   Dissemination of Free Cancer Cells from the Gastric Lumen and from Perigastric Lymphovascular Pedicles during Radical Gastric Cancer Surgery [J].
Han, Tae-Su ;
Kong, Seong-Ho ;
Lee, Hyuk-Joon ;
Ahn, Hye-Seong ;
Hur, Keun ;
Yu, Jieun ;
Kim, Woo-Ho ;
Yang, Han-Kwang .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (10) :2818-2825
[7]   Prospective randomized study of open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer [J].
Hayashi, H ;
Ochiai, T ;
Shimada, H ;
Gunji, Y .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (09) :1172-1176
[8]   Comparison of the Operative Outcomes and Learning Curves between Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer [J].
Huang, Kuo-Hung ;
Lan, Yuan-Tzu ;
Fang, Wen-Liang ;
Chen, Jen-Hao ;
Lo, Su-Shun ;
Li, Anna Fen-Yau ;
Chiou, Shih-Hwa ;
Wu, Chew-Wun ;
Shyr, Yi-Ming .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10)
[9]   Initial Experience of Robotic Gastrectomy and Comparison with Open and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer [J].
Huang, Kuo-Hung ;
Lan, Yuan-Tzu ;
Fang, Wen-Liang ;
Chen, Jen-Hao ;
Lo, Su-Shun ;
Hsieh, Mao-Chih ;
Li, Anna Fen-Yau ;
Chiou, Shih-Hwa ;
Wu, Chew-Wun .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (07) :1303-1310
[10]   Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer - Five-year results of a randomized prospective trial [J].
Huscher, CGS ;
Mingoli, A ;
Sgarzini, G ;
Sansonetti, A ;
Di Paola, M ;
Recher, A ;
Ponzano, C .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 241 (02) :232-237