Parameterized Bounded-Depth Frege Is not Optimal

被引:16
作者
Beyersdorff, Olaf [1 ]
Galesi, Nicola [2 ]
Lauria, Massimo [2 ]
Razborov, Alexander A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Comp, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Comp Sci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
Algorithms; Theory; Proof complexity; parameterized complexity; Resolution; bounded-depth Frege;
D O I
10.1145/2355580.2355582
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A general framework for parameterized proof complexity was introduced by Dantchev et al. [2007]. There, the authors show important results on tree-like Parameterized Resolution-a parameterized version of classical Resolution-and their gap complexity theorem implies lower bounds for that system. The main result of this article significantly improves upon this by showing optimal lower bounds for a parameterized version of bounded-depth Frege. More precisely, we prove that the pigeonhole principle requires proofs of size n(Omega(k)) in parameterized bounded-depth Frege, and, as a special case, in dag-like Parameterized Resolution. This answers an open question posed in Dantchev et al. [2007]. In the opposite direction, we interpret a well-known technique for FPT algorithms as a DPLL procedure for Parameterized Resolution. Its generalization leads to a proof search algorithm for Parameterized Resolution that in particular shows that tree-like Parameterized Resolution allows short refutations of all parameterized contradictions given as bounded-width CNFs.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   RESOLUTION IS NOT AUTOMATIZABLE UNLESS W[P] IS TRACTABLE [J].
Alekhnovich, Michael ;
Razborov, Alexander A. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2008, 38 (04) :1347-1363
[2]   The efficiency of resolution and Davis-Putnam procedures [J].
Beame, P ;
Karp, R ;
Pitassi, T ;
Saks, M .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2002, 31 (04) :1048-1075
[3]   The resolution complexity of independent sets and vertex covers in random graphs [J].
Beame, Paul ;
Impagliazzo, Russell ;
Sabharwal, Ashish .
COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2007, 16 (03) :245-297
[4]  
Beyersdorff O, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6695, P5
[5]  
Beyersdorff O, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6755, P630, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-22006-7_53
[6]   Lower bounds for cutting planes proofs with small coefficients [J].
Bonet, M ;
Pitassi, T ;
Raz, R .
JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 1997, 62 (03) :708-728
[7]   Optimality of size-width tradeoffs for resolution [J].
Bonet, ML ;
Galesi, N .
COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2001, 10 (04) :261-276
[8]  
Buss Samuel R., 1997, COMPUT SCI LOGIC, P149, DOI [10.1007/BFb0028012, DOI 10.1007/BFB0028012]
[9]   POLYNOMIAL SIZE PROOFS OF THE PROPOSITIONAL PIGEONHOLE PRINCIPLE [J].
BUSS, SR .
JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 1987, 52 (04) :916-927
[10]   The parameterized complexity of maximality and minimality problems [J].
Chen, Yijia ;
Flum, Joerg .
ANNALS OF PURE AND APPLIED LOGIC, 2008, 151 (01) :22-61