AN EVALUATION OF SELF-MEASURED BLOOD-PRESSURE IN A STUDY WITH A CALCIUM-CHANNEL ANTAGONIST VERSUS A BETA-BLOCKER

被引:35
作者
MENGDEN, T [1 ]
BINSWANGER, B [1 ]
WEISSER, B [1 ]
VETTER, W [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP ZURICH,DEPT INTERNAL MED,RAEMISTR 100,CH-8091 ZURICH,SWITZERLAND
关键词
CASUAL BLOOD PRESSURE; AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE; SELF-MEASURED BLOOD PRESSURE; BISOPROLOL; NITRENDIPINE;
D O I
10.1093/ajh/5.3.154
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
In recent years self-measurement of blood pressure at home has gained increasing importance but there have been only a few studies comparing casual, ambulatory, and self-measured blood pressure determinations during a single clinical trial. We therefore compared treatment-induced blood pressure-reductions in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study design with a single morning dose of either 10 mg bisoprolol (n = 26) or 20 mg nitrendipine (n = 27) with casual blood pressure readings in the morning before the dose, ambulatory 24-h monitoring, and self-recorded measurements in the morning before the dose and in the evening. Mean reductions for systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 4 weeks of therapy were significantly greater for bisoprolol than for nitrendipine. The treatment-induced blood pressure reductions were most pronounced as assessed by casual readings but showed good agreement between casual, ambulatory, and self-measured blood pressure for group comparisons. In some patients, however, marked individual differences between the three methods were observed. Correlation coefficients between ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure were 0.4 for systolic blood pressure (P < .05) and 0.6 for diastolic blood pressure (P < .0005). Under the conditions of this parallel study design and the usual statistical risks, a difference of 5 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure can be detected in 118 patients at the clinic, in 70 patients if ambulatory blood pressure is used, or in 56 patients if self-measured blood pressure is used. In conclusion, bisoprolol was more effective over 24 h than nitrendipine at the doses studied. Furthermore, self-measured blood pressure was suitable for monitoring 24-h efficacy of the two antihypertensive drugs under investigation. Finally, self-measured blood pressure can substantially improve the sensitivity of hypertension trials in comparison to casual readings and therefore reduce the number of patients included.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 160
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Self-measurement of blood pressure, J Hypertens, 6, pp. 257-261, (1988)
  • [2] Weisser B., Mengden T., Vetter W., Ambulatory twenty- four-hour blood pressure measurement in pharmacological studies, J Hypertens, 8, pp. 87-92, (1991)
  • [3] Mengden T., Battig B., Vetter W., Self-monitoring of blood pressure, J Hum Hypertens, 4, pp. 47-50, (1990)
  • [4] White B.W., Methods of blood pressure determination to assess antihypertensive agents: Are casual measurements enough?, Clin Pharmacol Therap, 45, pp. 581-586, (1989)
  • [5] Weber M.A., Cheung D.G., Graettinger W.F., Lipson J.L., Characterization of antihypertensive therapy by whole- day blood pressure monitoring, JAMA, 259, pp. 3281-3285, (1988)
  • [6] Steiner A., Oertel R., Battig B., Et al., Effect of fish oil on blood pressure and serum lipids in hypertension and hyperlipidaemia, J Hypertens, 7, pp. 73-76, (1989)
  • [7] Waeber B., Petrillo A., Scherrer U., Et al., Are some hypertensive patients overtreated. A prospective study on ambulatory blood pressure recording, Lancet, 2, pp. 732-734, (1987)
  • [8] Gould B.A., Homung R.S., Kieso H., Et al., An evaluation of self-recorded blood pressure during drug trials, Hypertension, 8, pp. 267-271, (1986)
  • [9] Cottier C., Julius S., Gajendragadkar S.V., Shork A., Usefulness of home blood pressure determination in treating borderline hypertension, JAMA, 248, pp. 555-558, (1982)
  • [10] Menard J., Serrurier D., Bautier P., Et al., Crossover design to test antihypertensive drugs with self-recorded blood pressure, Hypertension, 11, pp. 153-159, (1988)