From voluntary private to mandatory state governance in Indonesian forest certification: Reclaiming authority by bureaucracies

被引:18
作者
Wibowo, Agung [1 ]
Giessen, Lukas [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palangka Raya, Dept Forestry, Fac Agr, Palangka Raya, Indonesia
[2] Univ Gottingen, Chair Forest & Nat Conservat Policy, Gottingen, Germany
[3] EFI, Bonn Off, Bonn, Germany
关键词
competition; forest certification; international governance; private governance; state governance; bureaucratic politics; forest policy;
D O I
10.24259/fs.v2i1.3164
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Forest certification has been introduced by non-state actors as a voluntary and market-based instrument addressing forest problems, which state policies failed to resolve. Lately, however, state-driven forest-related certification schemes can be observed, e.g. in Indonesia, through the EU FLEGT-VPA negotiation process. It is argued, specific state agencies in a struggle for power and authority develop mandatory certification schemes which are directly competing with private ones. Before this background, the aims of this study are: (i) describing the current trend from voluntary private to mandatory state certification schemes in Indonesia, (ii) mapping the main actors involved in certification politics, and (iii) explaining this trend with the interests of the main actors. The results confirm a trend from voluntary private to mandatory state-driven certification of forest management. The Ministry of Forestry, the Ministry of Trade, the Ministry of Industry, wood producer and processing associations, European Union, local funding organizations, environmental organizations, certification bodies and international buyers are detected as the main coalitions and actors in the certification politics. The stronger coalition develops a nnandatorily-timber legality verification system as strategies to counter their voluntary private competitor schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 46
页数:19
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [11] Blackman A., 2014, DOES FOREST CERTIFIC
  • [12] Bostrom M., 2003, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, V5, P165, DOI 10.1080/1523908032000121184
  • [13] Brack, 2005, REV EUROPEAN COMMUNI, V14, P28, DOI [10.1111/j.1467-9388.2005.00421.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9388.2005.00421.X]
  • [14] Brack D., 2014, PROMOTING LEGAL SUST
  • [15] Brack D, 2012, HIGH VALUE NATURAL R, P211
  • [16] State actors and international forest certification policy: Coalitions behind FSC and PEFC in federal Argentina
    Burns, Sarah L.
    Yapura, Pablo F.
    Giessen, Lukas
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 52 : 23 - 29
  • [17] Meta-analysis of consumer's willingness-to-pay premiums for certified wood products
    Cai, Zhen
    Aguilar, Francisco X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS, 2013, 19 (01) : 15 - 31
  • [18] Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority
    Cashore, B
    [J]. GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2002, 15 (04): : 503 - 529
  • [19] Cashore B, 2005, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V48, P619
  • [20] Revising theories of nonstate market-driven (NSMD) governance: Lessons from the Finnish Forest Certification experience
    Cashore, Benjamin
    Egan, Elizabeth
    Auld, Graeme
    Newsom, Deanna
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2007, 7 (01) : 1 - +